I have always thought the word went indicated, more or less, something purposely done; yet, it is now used when there is no idea how something disappeared.
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
One meaning of the word 'go' (of which 'went' is the past tense) is:
to pass into a specified state
Thus, it acts similarly to the word 'become' and in that case, works perfectly well in the example cited in the question.
He went missing. vs. He became lost.
Hope that helps.
N.B. Understand then, that in this case, the word 'go/went' is intransitive and is nothing to do with movement as it would be in the sentence, 'He went to work."
There is no connotation of "deliberately" that attaches to the verb "go" (or its past tense "went").
In the last sentence, "went missing" just means they are no longer in sight. Perhaps the wandered off, or the speaker got lost, or whatever, but no purpose is implied by the statement.
My answer is based on that topic, from Ask the English teacher.
“Went missing” means “disappeared”, or “someone or something didn’t show up as expected”. Metaphorically, it can describe someone not paying attention or failing to attend to a task.
According to the following n-gram, the expression has been around for some time, and being used more and more since the 1970’s.
Also, here’s a citation from the post I mentioned on the beginning of this answer:
Based on that, i.e., the expression has a stable, well-defined meaning, it’s been used for decades now, and a native speaker think of it as “normal language”, I can say yes, the term is correct.
protected by tchrist Oct 31 '15 at 23:53
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?