I looked on Oxford's online dictionary and was able to find the names identifying orders of a given degree:

  1. primary
  2. secondary
  3. tertiary
  4. quaternary
  5. quinary
  6. senary
  7. septenary
  8. octonary
  9. nonary
  10. denary
  11. -- no term for 11th degree??
  12. duodenary

I am curious as to what would be the sequence of terms regarding a set of 'n' items? I have up to four:

  1. unary
  2. binary
  3. ternary
  4. quaternion

but, I cannot seem to find anything beyond that. Anyone know where this list may be?

link|improve this question

feedback

2 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The problem is that English uses two different kinds of adjectives to mean "first, second, etc". The ones in -ary without the -n- come from the Latin ordinals, "first, second, etc."; but they are different after 3.

  1. Primus — primary "first"
  2. Secundus — secondary "second"
  3. Tertius — tertiary
  4. Quartus — *quartary
  5. Quintus — *quintary

    ...

The -arius suffix is also used in Latin with ordinals, and secundarius means something like "second, pertaining to two, second in rank", though it often comes very close to the simple ordinal secundus. It usually adds some connotation of ranks and order in a grand system. There is also secundanus, which I believe isn't much different.

The -n- ones come from Latin distributive adjectives, "one each, two each, etc."; they are always used in plural. They were sometimes also used in a sense roughly similar to the ordinals, which is probably why English uses them in an odd way.

  1. (Singuli — single "one each")
  2. Bini — binary "two each"
  3. Terni/trini — ternary/*trinary
  4. Quaterni — quaternary
  5. Quini — quinary
  6. Seni — senary
  7. Septeni — septenary
  8. Octoni — octonary
  9. Noveni — *novenary
  10. Deni — denary
  11. Undeni — *undenary
  12. Duodeni — duodenary
  13. Terni/trini deni — *ternidenary/*tridenary

    ...

I believe the ones derived from ordinals were originally used to mean "second [in order]" in English, and the distributive -n- ones to mean "of two parts", or "characterised by the number 2". But then, because these meanings are related and often overlap, they got mixed up, resulting in the current defective lists, where the -n- forms serve both senses from 4 up.

The number one is the strangest exception of all, where a new word unary was made up, though no Latin equivalent exists (there is only unus, "one", but that is like using *duary from duo, "two"). Nonary is odd as well.

These are the Latin cardinal numbers for reference:

  1. Unus/una/unum/etc. (depending on gender and case) — "one"
  2. Duo/duorum/duarum/etc. (depending on case and gender) — "two"
  3. Tres/trium/etc. (depending on case)
  4. Quattuor
  5. Quinque
  6. Sex
  7. Septem
  8. Octo
  9. Novem
  10. Decim
  11. Undecim
  12. Duodecim
  13. Tredecim

...

link|improve this answer
ah, that's why I couldn't find a separate listing ... that's fine then for my purposes; the terms were going to be used in naming functions/classes in a library I am developing, and I was trying to be as grammatically accurate as I could. That's not usually a big deal for us programmers, but I tend to be more finicky about certain things than others. – Will May 13 '11 at 12:51
@Will: An excellent attitude! Users of the future with literary tastes will appreciate it in your software! – Cerberus May 13 '11 at 12:56
feedback

The arity of a function or operation is the number of arguments or operands that the function takes.

N-ary:

  • Nullary means 0-ary.

  • Unary means 1-ary.

  • Binary means 2-ary.

  • Ternary means 3-ary.

  • Quaternary means 4-ary.

  • Quinary means 5-ary.

  • Senary means 6-ary.

  • Septenary means 7-ary.

  • Octary means 8-ary.

  • Nonary means 9-ary.

Hope this helps.

link|improve this answer
...and for 10... decimal. – Mitch May 13 '11 at 1:04
...and alternatively base n. – Mitch May 13 '11 at 1:05
@Mitch No, bases are a different meaning. The words "binary" and "ternary" are used for both, but "octary" and "octal" are different. – aschepler May 13 '11 at 2:29
@aschepler: oops, you're right. what would the sequence be then for base n? – Mitch May 13 '11 at 2:32
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.