English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I can't seem to spot any differences or usages where one would use the hyphenation version versus the non.

According to Online Etymology they both point to coordinate.

I can see co-ordinate (v.) being used like co-pilot or co-chief, meaning a daulity or partner version. Example: Would you please co-ordinate with Bob. Meaning Bob is already ordinating and if you would also ordinate with him.

Yet I don't see that transferring over to the noun version meaning a location, especially in reference to mathematics and geography.

Is it simply a mix-up, or perhaps a localization issue (UK uses -, USA doesn't) or am I completely off base here?

share|improve this question
I think your premise that people envisage "coordinate" as being based on "ordinate" (except in the mathematical sense) is probably not true. – Neil Coffey May 12 '11 at 11:46
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Making a quick search in my NOAD, it seems they are the same exact term.

But, like I was thinking, coordinate is the term used, since if you search for co-ordinate, it will redirect you to the other one.

Look what happens if you search for co-ordinate in the OALD.

If you type them in Google, you'll get the following results:

  • Co-ordinate: About 5,190,000 results;
  • Coordinate: About 58,100,000 results.

Quite a difference... In the end I suppose the hyphened version is a variant, you might use either, although nowadays they're not really considered compound words anymore (another similar words is cooperate) but single words.

share|improve this answer
Thanks, that's what I concluded also - never thought of comparing Google result totals. – WSkid May 12 '11 at 9:32
By the way, just for the record, my OED gives only the hyphened version. This proves that the other variant exists, but it still remains less used considering what I found. I thought it could interest you to know this point of view as well. – Alenanno May 12 '11 at 9:34

According to Longman DOCE, co-ordinate is British English.

And for better understanding of hyphen usage see Oxford Dictionary:

In modern English the use of hyphens is in general decreasing, especially in compound nouns: website is preferred to web-site, and air raid to air-raid. Hyphens are still often employed where a compound expression precedes a noun, as in first-rate musician or twenty-odd people (twenty odd people means something quite different!), but even in this context there is a growing trend to omit them. When a phrasal verb such as build up is made into a noun it is usually hyphenated (a build-up of pressure ). Note, however, that a normal phrasal verb should not be hyphenated: write food to take away not food to take-away, and continue to build up your pension not continue to build-up your pension

share|improve this answer

Is it simply a mix-up, or perhaps a localization issue (UK uses -, USA doesn't) or am I completely off base here?

Yes, it is a local issue. I know from my experiences, that co-ordinate is the more common spelling in the UK. It's commonly used and is the spelling that I was taught, in the UK.

Whenever I have seen the word used in American writing, in publications or on the internet, I have noticed that it has always been with the coordinate spelling.

These dictionary pages mention that co-ordinate is the spelling in the UK.





share|improve this answer
FWIW, the customer representative in a project in which I used to work, an Englishman, routinely asked for converting coordinates (geographical meaning) into co-ordinates. Now I understand why. – Gorpik Jun 13 '12 at 11:52
It makes sense, considering that the English spelling represents its English (rather than American) pronunciation. Co (rhymes with low) and then ordinate. – Tristan Jun 28 '12 at 11:35

They are the exact same term, as Alenanno says. The reason for hyphenation is likely due to the fact that 'oo' has a different pronunciation than desired. In my experience with American English it's a preferred spelling when the word used is not likely to be familiar or when the pronunciation would otherwise be easily misread.

'Cooperate' is sometimes seen as 'co-operate' just to highlight that the double 'o' is two different vowel sounds. 'Cooperate' could be pronounced like 'coop' (as in a chicken coop). Words like 'co-opt' are still always spelled with a hyphen precisely because of this.

'Cooperate', 'coordinate' and other words are common enough that the word is accepted sans-hypen. People now recognize these words so the hyphen has stopped being necessary.

share|improve this answer

There are three acceptable spellings of coordinate: the official one is coördinate (with the trema indicating the start of a new syllable), and the resulting tremaless coordinate is thus also correct (but leads to the potential of an uninformed reader to pronounce it "COOR-dinate" with coor rhyming with poor). The hyphenated version co-ordinate is also correct, as it re-introduces the separation of two syllables between the two "o"s, but as was pointed out, this is not a compound word (so, strictly, the use of a hyphen is incorrect here – it is acceptable only because it is replacing a trema).

Usage of the various spellings seems to be in the ratio of about 5000:500:1 for coordinate : co-ordinate : coördinate.

share|improve this answer
What do you actually mean by "official"? As far as I'm aware, there's no body legislating on the spelling of the word "coordinate".... – Neil Coffey May 12 '11 at 11:44
What's your source? – Steve Melnikoff May 12 '11 at 12:29
"the official one"? Do you have an "authoritative" reference you can cite? (The New Yorker's in-house style guide doesn't count.) – Pitarou Jun 12 '12 at 23:38
Good points for mentioning the trema spelling (new word I learned today -- I just called it an umlaut), but reference to "official" and "correct" is not going to win you many friends here. – Kevin Peterson Jun 13 '12 at 3:46
That's an interesting point about "the potential of an uninformed reader to pronounce it "COOR-dinate" with coor rhyming with poor". I have heard a few people pronounce it that way. Some Americans and students of American English. – Tristan Jul 12 '12 at 10:04

protected by tchrist Mar 1 '15 at 18:32

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.