English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

English nouns — other than those with natural gender, e.g. people or animals — do not generally have grammatical gender, and so are referred to as 'it' rather than 'he' or 'she'.

However, modern English has its roots in Norman French and Anglo-Saxon (Old English), both of which used grammatical gender for their nouns. In addition, other modern languages related to these continue to use grammatical gender today.

So, how come English doesn't?

share|improve this question
up vote 15 down vote accepted

Wikipedia (citing A history of the English language by Richard M. Hogg and David Denison) suggests that the loss of gender in English was "due to a general decay of inflectional endings and declensional classes by the end of the 14th century" as evidenced by increasing use of the gender-neutral identifier þe (the or thee).

"Why" is, of course, a difficult question to answer here. It seems that whatever pressures had influence over the evolution of the English language, the net result was a loss of accents, inflections and declensions. The above sources indicate that grammatical gender is like another form of inflection or declension, so it gradually disappeared from the language at the same time.

share|improve this answer
From the book reference you've given it seems that this loss of gender originated from the north of England, so perhaps it was the influence of the Scandinavian languages rather than the Norman French. – delete Sep 4 '10 at 13:18
I want to also add that having a gender system is a feature of only a small number of the world's languages, so an even more interesting question might be: why do any languages have a gender system? – Kosmonaut Sep 28 '10 at 14:23
This aligns with what I was taught in an Old English/History of the English Language class in college. – In the Booley House Sep 28 '10 at 14:56
Moreover, gender systems are not consistent among languages. French/German: soleil(m)/Sohne(f); French/Italian: minute(f)/minuto(m) – mouviciel Sep 29 '10 at 8:22
@Kosmonaut @Claudiu Looks like languages with grammatical gender and the ones without are split about 50/50. Many non-IE languages have gender, like Swahili with no less than 18 noun classes. I suppose independent languages have no particular reason to use the same linguistic mechanisms - you can have a language with or without gender, inflectional endings, tongue clicks... it works either way. – j-g-faustus Feb 12 '11 at 1:08

Reading the entire Ask MetaFilter thread, I encountered the following comments and resultant dialogue which may aid. Please inform me of any evidence or references.

Interestingly, English is probably mostly genderless because it is a creole of Norman French and Saxon English, which itself was more or less a creole of Danish and Old English by the time the Normans got there.

So, twice English had large groups of people who couldn't remember each other's noun genders, and probably mumbled something like "the" instead of whatever the correct pronoun was. Eventually everyone gave up on gender.

posted by musofire at 2:27 PM on December 4, 2012 [4 favorites]

[...] [In reference to the above conjecture] This is silly.
It's not how language and history typically work and wouldn't explain why other European languages have retained gender and other complicated features despite longer and much more frequent periods of occupation by groups of people with even harder language differences to overcome. If one believes it, it poses the question of why the residents of Britain were so stupid - people all over the world speak multiple languages fluently with no problem, and without formal education! I've spent time in places where uneducated peasants have spoken fluent German, Romani, Romanian and Hungarian (three separate branches of IE and one totally unrelated language) for centuries without any more blending going on than the borrowing of a few words.

There are quite a lot of serious theories out there why English lost gender, but that isn't one of them!

Here's an interesting one. [...]

posted by Dee Xtrovert at 11:57 PM on December 4, 2012 [2 favorites]

The last link above is too long to reproduce here and so I do not unless requested;
but it is entitled From Grammatical to Natural Gender
by Jesse Archibald-Barber BA (Victoria) MA (Toronto) PhD (Toronto).

share|improve this answer

protected by tchrist Nov 19 '14 at 4:24

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.