My basic knowledge of these two words is that they both mean the same thing. So why are they used differently, and what is their difference in meaning?
|
|
Let's get some standard definitions in here. hypothesis:
theory:
All from wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn. |
|||||
|
|
A hypothesis is a testable prediction. A theory is a tested, and usually widely accepted, hypothesis. |
|||
|
|
|
I think this is mainly related to their usage in american-english. Originally, these two words have very different meanings. A hypothesis is an assumption made for the sake of argument. Theory is the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another used to draw a conclusion or an explanation of some phenomenon. A theory may use a number of hypothesis to draw one, or more, conclusions. Unfortunately, people often say "it's just a theory" almost as if theory was an assumption about something. Nonetheless, you can see the difference from the definitions above. |
|||
|
|
|
A hypothesis is something expected to be true, but not yet proved (Synonyms: presumption, assumption, conjecture). For example:
However, a theory is a proposition which is most likely to be true, and is derived from other true statements (theorems). They may also be analyses of facts. For example:
|
|||
|
|
|
Hypothesis is a single statement regarding relationship between variables that can be tested by observation. Hypotheses are usually formulated to support or deny theories. Usually, several hypotheses on a fact, if scientifically proven, become a theory. A theory, on the other hand, is a systematic set of generalization that explains some phenomenal linking variables in order to come up with principles that are internally consistent. It should be noted that a theory is only accepted after successful researches on a certain formulation about a fact are done while a hypothesis is just a mere formulation of a fact. |
||||
|
|
