English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In this interview on the TV show The Wire, David Simon (the show's creator) says:

Much of our modern theater seems rooted in the Shakespearean discovery of the modern mind. [The show is] stealing instead from ... the Greeks ... to create doomed and fated protagonists who confront a rigged game and their own mortality. The modern mind ... finds such fatalism ancient and discomfiting ... We are a pretty self-actualized, self-worshipping crowd of postmoderns and the idea that for all of our wherewithal and discretionary income and leisure, we’re still fated by indifferent gods, feels to us antiquated and superstitious. We don’t accept our gods on such terms anymore ... we don’t even grant Yahweh himself that kind of unbridled, interventionist authority.

What exactly is meant by "the Shakespearean discovery of the modern mind"?

share|improve this question
i guess, it means that way that shakespear used to discover readers mind. they use the same method as shakepear to get attention of people. just came to my mind! – Gigili May 7 '11 at 17:50
As intersteing as this question is, it seems pretty off topic (what is there about language or usage?) I think you should move this to writers.SE. – Mitch May 7 '11 at 17:58
@Mitch -- ah, you are definitely right. How do I execute the move? – dsg May 7 '11 at 18:06
I think if you use the 'flag' option for 'other' and explain, then they'll do it for you. If no one has answered I think you can delete the question here by hand yourself and just cut and paste your text to a new question that you open up over there. – Mitch May 7 '11 at 18:34
I'm not sure it would be on-topic on Writers. Hold on while I ask around. Update: this really isn't on topic on Writers, so migration is not an option. Whoever votes to close, please do not vote to migrate so it doesn't get migrated automatically. Thanks. – RegDwigнt May 7 '11 at 19:19
up vote 6 down vote accepted

It is essentially a reference to Harold Bloom's influential book Shakespeare and the Invention of the Human.

Bloom's wildly audacious book posits that Shakespeare invented the modern milieu of existence.

The only book I know as audacious as this — and somewhat similar — is Julian Jayne's The Origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind, which posits that Homer (The Odyssey, The Iliad) merely essentially invented human consciousness as we know it.

Furthermore, the presenter you mention, David Simon, simply goes on to explain in the quote you gave what Simon means, his take on the "Bloomian idea" if you will: to wit, Simon feels that only with Shakespeare did we move from "indifferent Gods control us" mode to today's "we control everything" consciousness.

As a language-consciousness freak, I love reading about ideas like this. A third point here is the novel Snow Crash by bizarre sci-fi/consciousness/whatever writer Neal Stephenson, which deals with the "memetics", if you will, of the early days of consciousness in humans (say, 50,000 years ago).

In short, when Simon says "the Shakespearean discovery of the modern mind," it's a riff on Bloom's Shakespeare and the Invention of the Human.

share|improve this answer

This just points up the contrast with the modern view that "anything is possible as long as we will it" vs. the fatalistic Greek notion that we are playthings of fate (i.e. "the gods") who may do things to hasten our fall but nothing to prevent it.

I feel obliged to point out that, as much as I admire The Wire, that excellent series of David Simon's, I'm not sure I would agree that his analogy about Greek drama is accurate to several decimal places, nor is his contention that Shakespeare discovered "the modern mind" in his plays. In fact, in Form and Meaning in Drama, H. D. F. Kitto, a noted expert in classical Greek literature and theater, devotes a whole section of this book about Greek drama to an interpretation of Hamlet as an exemplar of Greek tragedy. I can't think of a single one of Shakespeare's tragedies, in fact, which I would think of as being about self-actualization. Think of his "star-crossed lovers" in Romeo and Juliet or the ambition of Macbeth that actualizes only his own demise. (Really, David Simon, I love your work — but shut up about things you haven't thought through!)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.