Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Japanese there's a saying "another loach" in the short form, "look for another loach under the same willow tree" in the long form.

This saying is for ridiculing a person who blindly repeats what s/he once successfully did, or who imitates what somebody else successfully did, in the hope that s/he can succeed again not knowing s/he would surely fail the second time.

It comes from a famous folklore about a man who once captured a loach (like a catfish) in a stream under a willow tree, who tried unsuccessfully to catch another loach exactly at the same spot.

I am wondering if there is a saying in English similar to this?

share|improve this question
2  
I'm having a "tip of the tongue" moment with this question. My ind keeps going back to "Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while", but that isn't really what you want. –  Kevin May 3 '11 at 18:02
    
The closest I can come is the contrary: “Lead to success, follow to failure”. –  F'x May 3 '11 at 18:11
    
Like @Kevin experienced, There's an expression lingering at the edge of my mind. It includes the word "chasing" but I can't quite think of it a the moment. –  TecBrat Aug 17 '12 at 10:57

5 Answers 5

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Wow, that's a useful saying. English seems to have the opposite sayings -- that success or failure of a particular sort make repetitions less likely:

The cat, having sat upon a hot stove lid, will not sit upon a hot stove lid again. But he won't sit upon a cold stove lid, either. -- Mark Twain

or

Lightning never strikes twice in the same place

share|improve this answer
    
ObQuote: "like the cat i'th'adage, letting I dare not' wait upon I would'" –  Mitch May 3 '11 at 18:57
    
Thanks! I guess I didn't explain the saying well enough. In fact it's for ridiculing a person who blindly tries to do what once gave him/her success. Definitely I need to study English more ;) –  Yuji May 3 '11 at 19:17
    
No, I think that was clear -- I just don't think English has a saying to discourage someone from repeating previously successful patterns. There's a quote supposedly from Albert Einstein, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Your saying would be about doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for the same results, which isn't insane, but may be over-optimistic.) –  Malvolio May 3 '11 at 23:23
    
You deserve a downvote for Twain butchery, but I won't :-) –  Pete Wilson May 4 '11 at 3:23
    
@PeteWilson -- I just copied what Google gave me. Do you have a better site? –  Malvolio May 6 '11 at 2:29

Cargo-cult is probably the nearest.

eg. in software a cargo-cult programmer keeps writing the same code they wrote before - because it worked in that situation.

share|improve this answer
    
That's a good comparison. But, somehow, cargo-cult feels a little different... –  Yuji May 3 '11 at 23:45

There is at least one saying that is the other side of this coin - for a person who fails, but nevertheless continues the same action: "A fool trips over the same stone twice." Not what you want, but useful in its own right.

Ironically, a good fishing hole really is a good fishing hole, and what made it a favored habitat for the first loach would likely attract others to it as well - venerated sayings notwithstanding.

share|improve this answer

It sounds a little like "searching under the street light."

share|improve this answer

I think this English saying is close to your meaning, with the caveat that it's a little more optimistic. ;-) Maybe there's a few "loaches", but if you fish out the stream, you're a fool.

The pitcher which goes too often to the well gets broken

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.