Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Over time I developed this rule where if a title or a proper name is followed by a common noun that represents the class of the entity I am referring to, then I use the definite article. In Example 1, the title of a publication in the first sentence is followed by the noun "whitepaper", thus the definite article in front of it. Is this a valid rule?

Example 1:

The "Advanced programming in Java" whitepaper was an excellent read.

"Advanced programming in Java" was an excellent read.

Example 2:

The Microsoft Office 2010 product was released last year.

Microsoft Office 2010 was released last year.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Yes, it is. This is because the "Advanced programming in Java" whitepaper phrase forms a syntactic unit, with whitepaper as the head of the unit. The definite article for a phrase always corresponds to the head of the phrase, so using the definite (or indefinite) article for these phrases makes perfect sense and is correct English.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the answer! To clarify one more thing, would using the article in the examples without the common noun be incorrect ("The" Advanced Programming in Java was an excellent read)? –  Tom Sep 1 '10 at 12:43
3  
Sort of. In formal English, certainly it would be something to avoid. In casual speech, things along these lines are done from time to time. You example sounds more awkward for some reason, but I am thinking of, e.g., someone offering you several types of beer and you responding "I'll take the Heineken". –  Kosmonaut Sep 1 '10 at 12:57

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.