Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm confused what this sentence means. Does it mean that many people consider X respected, or that a few people consider X respected?

not a few people consider respected and X to be an oxymoron

Side question: is this sentence structure convoluted or is it just me?

share|improve this question
1  
That should maybe be changed to be "not a few people consider 'respected and X' to be an oxymoron." BTW, does X = "feared" (or is there not a particular X)? –  compman Apr 29 '11 at 2:30
    
@user7834 The X is actually the name of a person. I didn't think it would appropriate to put the name here :) –  fifo Apr 29 '11 at 17:26

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

It means that many people consider X the opposite of respected.

Not a few means "many".

An oxymoron is a witty combination of opposite terms.

And, yes, this sentence is very convoluted; that is probably done ironically and on purpose. It is a figure of speech that is supposed to be mildly entertaining.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 OK, but it is perhaps wishful thinking to attribute to irony that which can be adequately explained by incompetence ;) –  Jason Orendorff Apr 29 '11 at 15:09

I think it may also intended to convey that the author of the sentence may not agree with the statement. Maybe more than 'not a few' consider it, as in, 'many', but the author considers those 'many' to be incorrect in their usage so therefore they highlight this disagreement with the use of 'not a few'.

You could also have the complete opposite interpretation. I.e., they agree with the 'not a few' and are trying to use hyperbole. I.e., "not a few people consider wife-beating to be wrong."

It really depends on the context of use which is really hard to determine with what is provided.

share|improve this answer

Yes, "not a few" in this case means a lot. It is an example of litotes, a rhetorical figure involving understatement through negation of the reverse (think about when someone says a thing is "not bad" they actually mean it is good.).

That said, there's something a bit stuffy about the way it's used here.

share|improve this answer
2  
It's bad litotes. It's gratuitous and it weighs down any already overburdened sentence. Even the corrected "many people" begs for a Wiki-esque [citation needed]. How about "The phrase 'respected and X' is an oxymoron" ? –  Malvolio Apr 29 '11 at 3:57
1  
Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea. –  Sam Apr 29 '11 at 5:28
1  
I don't know. Things of this nature are really dependent on the context of use. If the author has been writing in a self deprecating manner or in a manner that is belittling of the subject at hand then it can be interpreted in a multitude of ways depending on what was previously written. Imho modern usage of this is normally done for comedic effect or to highlight interpretive irony. –  Qberticus Apr 29 '11 at 5:29
    
@Malvolio: Wow, I wasn't even on your lawn. –  Robusto Apr 29 '11 at 8:52
1  
please don't take my comment as any criticism of you . I'm glad to see someone besides me interested in rhetorical forms (my proudest day as a parent was when my daughter pointed out an example of antimetabole on a billboard). I just thought the original sentence was bad, bad writing. –  Malvolio Apr 29 '11 at 16:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.