and only have different pronunciations?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
It's probably not easy to answer exactly why this happened (past and present being identical in spelling), because I don't think anyone ever set out to do things this way. Like most standard English words, read was not always spelled this way. The OED lists, for example, rædde, redis, redys, reeds, reids, redds, reed, red, redd, etc. over the course of written English history. The OED does briefly touch on the past/present spelling issue:
To me, that is not a terribly satisfying answer, but it could be the correct one.
protected by tchrist Oct 28 '14 at 2:27
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?