If I were to say,
Can't I just be wearing my swim suit already?
Would "be wearing" be improper English?
|
If I were to say,
Would "be wearing" be improper English? |
|||||
|
|
Your sentence makes perfect sense in this context:
|
||||
|
|
|
"be wearing" is fine in certain uses:
I don't really understand your example sentence, however, so it strikes me as incorrect. Perhaps one of these will work better:
"Already" seems slightly out of place as well but I can see how it would work with the right context:
|
||||
|
|
|
Maybe your example sentence would work if you were indicating that you want your character in, say, a novel to "be wearing" a swimsuit in a certain scene:
|
|||
|
|
|
I think there are proper ways to use the phrase "be wearing" (e.g., "Shouldn't you be wearing warmer clothes?") but I think your example is questionable at best. |
|||
|
|
|
Technically, it's a properly formatted English sentence. You have the verb "cannot," followed by the subject "I," followed by the word "just," followed by the verb "be," followed by a state of being, followed by an object, followed by an adverb. However, in this case, you're using the verb "be" as a helper verb with "wearing," making it another tense; in this case, the word "cannot" should be strictly followed by an infinitive (and while "be" is an infinitive, it's combined with "wearing" to form a non-infinitive tense). I'm sure that several English majors could argue for days on whether or not that you're allowed to do this, but most people will see it as grammatically awkward and say that it's wrong. If you ask an average person off of the street, they may say that it's wrong, but they'll likely say that it sounds odd. I'd consider it to be wrong, and the correct form would be "can't I wear." If a participle other than "wearing" was used, it could be treated as an adjective, which would be correct in all cases. For example:
|
|||
|
|