English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was reading letters from a surgeon to his wife during the Civil War and noticed he used "was" as opposed to "were" on many occasions. Examples:

I truly wish you was here with me.

Was you planning to visit...?

Other than this strange (to me) usage, his language was very formal and correct. Has there been an evolution in the accepted usage of was/were?

share|improve this question

From The Cambridge History of the English Language: English in North America, p. 332, by John Algeo, via Google Books:

When thou, thee, and thine dropped out of the language in the early Colonial period on both sides of the Atlantic, speakers felt a need nonetheless to distinguish between singular and plural forms. The earliest attempt was simply to make verb agreement do the work: speakers would say you was for the singular and you were for the plural. Beginning in the eighteenth century, this sensible solution was met with heavy resistance from purists, and you was became heavily stigmatized by the end of the nineteenth century in America (though it has by no means dropped out of colloquial speech in the United States).

share|improve this answer
+1, I think Gollum speaks like that. – Alain Pannetier Φ Apr 24 '11 at 23:32
Fascinating.... – Carl Brannen Apr 25 '11 at 0:17

This misuse of was for were in the subjunctive was and is common. EDIT: Some wish that it were not so.

share|improve this answer
I don't think the question is about the subjunctive. The second example is quite telling. Looks more like a question about dialectal differences. – RegDwigнt Apr 24 '11 at 13:51
@RegDwight - That the writer is wishing for his wife's company requires the subjunctive when he expresses the wish in writing. Maybe the grammar error is dialectical, but the error is still an error. – Pete Wilson May 2 '11 at 4:42
@Pete Wilson: But if you are using the conjugation I was/you was/he was//we were/you were/they were for the simple past, what conjugation are you supposed to use for the subjunctive? – Peter Shor May 2 '11 at 4:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.