Was someone just trying to be funny by being ironic?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
Sesquipedalian means having many syllables, and you'll probably know what phobia means. Thus, "sesquipedaliophobia" is an irrational fear of words with many syllables. The prefixes "hippopoto-" and "monstro-", as you might guess, are not there to add anything in terms of meaning, in fact they are rather nonsensical. Their only purpose is to make the word longer, in a witty and cruel, sarcastic twist.
So I guess the answer to your question is yes, you can say that someone was trying to be funny.
One of the earliest instance of either hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia or sesquipedaliophobia in a Google Books search is from Chris Aldrich, The Aldrich Dictionary of Phobias and Other Word Families (2002), which lists both of them, in this entry:
However, a significantly earlier instance occurs in Dennis Coon, Introduction to Psychology: Exploration and Application, second edition [?] (1980), which includes this footnote:
But that is as early as the entries get for either word. Two different reference works point out that hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia is one letter longer than supercalifragilisticexpialadocious, a nonce word that became famous from a song in the 1964 film Mary Poppins. It seems likely to me that the hippopotomonstro- prefix attached to the shorter word sesquipedaliophobia is there simply to make the resulting word longer than the Mary Poppins word.
It is difficult to find any mention of hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia that doesn't remark on the irony of the fact that the word for "fear of long words" is such a long word. But it appears to have no claim to existence outside the purposeful lengthening (for effect) of sesquipedaliophobia. Any word that appears on paper is a "real" word, in some sense. But I think it's fair to say that hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia is an artificially long word, not a naturally long one—and therefore that it did not come into existence under the same rules of formation that govern most words in the English language.
protected by Mari-Lou A Feb 29 at 21:47
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?