Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hopefully a simple one, but my Google-fu is letting me down.

Typically, when alpabetising titles, I would move the 'The' to the end of the title but, in the case of a sequel, should that be moved to before or after a sequel numeral?

For example:

  • Amazing Spider-Man, The
  • Amazing Spider-Man, The 2
  • Amazing Spider-Man 2, The

Which of the latter two is traditionally correct?

share|improve this question
    
sure, it's the last one –  Joe Blow Aug 31 at 6:43
    
Prequels would lead to a tangled web. –  Edwin Ashworth Aug 31 at 6:56
1  
What are you alphabetising and why? This will make a big difference to how you do it? –  Araucaria Aug 31 at 11:34
    
@EdwinAshworth - how so? –  jimbobmcgee Aug 31 at 13:57
    
@Araucaria - in this case, I was renaming some movie filenames, so they would sort better on my home media server, but it could apply to books too. –  jimbobmcgee Aug 31 at 14:00

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The last version listed is correct: "Amazing Spider-Man 2, The" adding the 2 at the end is confusing and non-intuitive while omitting it entirely does not resolve conflicts between sequels. Additionally, adding the number before the comma still keeps sequels ordered intuitively and is also easier to read. The only reason people move 'the' to the end of ordered list titles is to prevent a huge, useless cluster of elements under 'T' that people would be more likely to look for under other letters. This is not a concern with a number that comes at the end of a title and thus the number does not have to be moved.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.