Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider this passage in the Georgia DDS 2010 Driver’s Manual: on page 40:

The Georgia Move-Over Law requires drivers to move over one lane when possible if an emergency vehicle with flashing lights is parked on the shoulder of the highway. If traffic is too heavy to move over safely, the law requires drivers to slow down below the posted speed limit AND to be prepared to stop.

Without knowing why to move over, does the "Move-Over" usage above make it clear to where?

This law is a safety law, but if someone doesn't know that, is there a grammatical support to it?

If instead of "Emergency vehicle... of the highway" it was "an Emergency vehicle is flashing its lights behind you" it might have been understood as move to the left, Therefore the only clue to the understanding of where to move to is common sense and meaning and not sentence grammar.

Note that it is phrased "Move-Over ... if an emergency vehicle ..." and not "Move-Over ... for" one

So can it be understood by any reader, that it requires to Move Over to the right and not the left?

share|improve this question
    
Related to english.stackexchange.com/questions/18328/… –  Eran Medan Apr 2 '11 at 21:03
2  
The reason is safety and it is very clear that it means you should move away from the lane adjacent to the shoulder, or slow down/ –  z7sg Ѫ Apr 2 '11 at 22:01
    
@z7sh: But if I tell you that in another country, when a police car stops on the side of the road, flashing their lights, one should slow down and move to the RIGHT to allow that officer the ability to safely pull that car over, without having to step into the road. It's easy to understand after you hear the explanation, but without explaining, not everyone will guess it –  Eran Medan Apr 2 '11 at 22:26

4 Answers 4

up vote 2 down vote accepted

In the passage you cited, there is no indication whatsoever as to which -direction- to move over.

There is no real semantic difference between 'if' and 'for' here (other than 'for' is not grammatical in place of the 'if').

I would presume that such a manual would have general rules like 'Carry out further rules in the safest manner possible', and 'safest' would involve some judgement and common sense (yes, the rule book is sort of a list of common sense things). For example, a general rule might be 'Do not pass on the right' but an unstated common sense exception would be 'unless you're passing a stopped vehicle in the left most lane'. For the instance you're thinking of, maybe if you're in a multi-lane traffic, the default is to move over/pull over to the right, but if you're closer to the left side you might be expected to pullover to the left. This is pure speculation, and I have no idea of the particulars of your situation.

share|improve this answer
    
Actually Driver manuals, and this specifically, do state exactly every exception to any general rule like "always pass on the right", including that it's allowed if the vehicle in front of you is turning left (and more). –  Eran Medan Apr 2 '11 at 22:32

When reading the passage, I assumed it referred to travel on a multi-lane highway where the shoulder would usually refer to the far right hand side of the road (the far left being considered the median). Given this, I assumed that it meant move over to the left, away from the shoulder where emergency vehicles (particularly police cars issuing tickets to speeders) are usually parked.

In looking at the actual Georgia law, by the way, I noticed that it does not even use the phrase move over—or the word shoulder for that matter. Instead it says make a lane change and seems to be written to allow for a lane change in either direction as long as it is to a lane not adjacent to the parked emergency vehicle.

share|improve this answer

The purpose of this law (which isn't limited to Georgia) is to ensure the safety of police officers performing traffic stops.

Traffic stops are one of the most dangerous aspects of a police officer's job and this law is an attempt to mitigate the inherent dangers associated.

The Move-Over Law requires drivers to move away from the vehicle with the flashing lights so as to give them a physical buffer. Generally, the stopped vehicle will be to the right of the road, but in some instances it could be on the left and the implication (in this case) would be that drivers should move to the right.

share|improve this answer
1  
I know what the law means, the question is, it is implied by the grammar of the sentence and is there any way in the world someone might mistaken or not be sure to which way, without knowing the purpose of the law –  Eran Medan Apr 2 '11 at 22:30

As others have said, grammatically the sentence does not specify which way to move.

Can it be understood by any reader? At least one person was confused so clearly the answer is 'no' :) But I think the context would make it clear to "most" readers. Even if you didn't understand that it was a safety law, what sense is there in telling people to crowd over toward a stopped emergency vehicle on the side of the road?

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.