Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Wikipedia's article on vespers contains this passage (my emphasis):

The name, however, by which it was most widely known during that period was Lucernalis or Lucernaria hora (l. c., 126). This name is characteristic. It was so called because at this hour a number of candles were lighted, not only to give light, but also for symbolical purposes.

I think I would have said for symbolic purposes. This got me thinking: do 'symbolic' and 'symbolical' mean the same thing? I couldn't tell you any difference between them.

If that's the case, it seems redundant to make use of both. There will be times when one or the other is more appropriate for contextual reasons (eg if you need something to rhyme!), but in general, should we prefer one over the other? I lean towards preferring 'symbolic', because it's shorter and cleaner.

More generally, is 'symbolical' some sort of hypercorrection? Or, if not hypercorrection, is it in the same genus as 'burglarize', where words grow unnecessary decorative plumage at the end which emphasises which part of speech they are?

share|improve this question
2  
    
Less related things i've always wondered: why do we have no theologists, biologians, or mathematicists? –  Tom Anderson Apr 2 '11 at 18:05

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

According to the OED, symbolical predates symbolic by a few years at least. Both date from the 17th century, but symbolical came first. Surprised me, as I agree with you that symbolical sounds a bit silly.

share|improve this answer
    
Is there any comparison between numeric and numerical? –  LCFactorization Feb 2 at 8:08

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.