English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Here is a sentence which doesn't really sound grammatically correct. I would appreciate if any one can have a look and let me know if the sentence could be improved.

After all, when someone spends a quality amount of money, he would want every penny spent to count

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by tchrist, Mr. Shiny and New 安宇, Jim, StoneyB, RegDwigнt Jul 9 '14 at 18:50

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Mr. Shiny and New 安宇, Jim, StoneyB, RegDwigнt
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

With the correction, it's fine syntactically; but what is a "quality amount" of money? – StoneyB Jul 9 '14 at 17:50
Yup. There's nothing wrong with it now. Let's delete it. – John Lawler Jul 9 '14 at 17:51
@StoneyB can u suggest an alternate way to re write the sentence... – iJade Jul 9 '14 at 17:55
I could if I knew what you mean by a quality amount. – StoneyB Jul 9 '14 at 18:17
@StoneyB what I intended was a large amount of money – iJade Jul 9 '14 at 18:31
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Suggested correction:

After all, when someone spends a large amount of money, they usually expect every penny to count.

The most irregular part of your sentence as submitted was "quality amount of money". I've introduced a singular "they" which others may disagree with, but certainly sounds like Standard American English.

share|improve this answer

I am not sure about the helping verb "would". Doesn't the usage of "would" create the subjunctive mood? If so, then "when" should be "if"?

If "when" is not changed, then with regard to intended meaning, "would" should be "should". Or, I'd just delete the "would". The meaning does not change, the sentence becomes shorter, and the sentence sounds more crisp.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.