English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

New York Times (July 3) carries an article written by its Op-Ed columnist, Paul Krugman under the title, “Build We Won’t.” in which the author claims;

“In prosperous times, public spending on roads, bridges and so on competes with the private sector for resources. Since 2008, however, our economy has been awash in unemployed workers and capital with no place to go. Putting those idle resources to work building useful stuff should have been a no-brainer. --- Everyone from progressive think tanks to the United States Chamber of Commerce thinks we need good roads. Yet the combination of anti-tax ideology and deficit hysteria that mostly whipped up in an attempt to bully President Obama into spending cuts means that we’re letting our highways, and our future, erode away.


I can understand the point Paul Krugman argues, but I’m not clear with what the caption, “Build we won’t.” means.

I thought it can go like “Build what we will not build. But it doesn’t make sense as a sentence.

How can I parse “Build we won’t”? Is it common to save the word to such a few words in writing, particularly in journalism English?

share|improve this question
It's just an inversion of "We won't build" with respect to our infrastructure. – Jim Jul 5 '14 at 2:27
Jim. In that case, don't you say "Build, (that) we won't"? – Yoichi Oishi Jul 5 '14 at 2:31
Cont. Krugman is insisting "We should build." – Yoichi Oishi Jul 5 '14 at 2:34
No. I suppose one might hear: "Build? That we won't"- (That we will not do" other than that, I can't make sense of your suggested that. – Jim Jul 5 '14 at 2:35
Yes, apparently everyone thinks we should build but: "Yet the combination of anti-tax ideology and deficit hysteria that mostly whipped up in an attempt to bully President Obama into spending cuts means that we’re letting our highways, and our future, erode away." The last sentence is saying, "In spite of that we're not building" – Jim Jul 5 '14 at 2:37
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The phrase “Build We Won’t” is meant to echo (as tragedy or as farce) a once-popular U.S. phrase: “Dig We Must.” The origin of the latter phrase (which in full read either “Dig we must for a greater New York” or “Dig We Must for Growing New York,” depending on which source you believe) appeared on warning signs posted during the 1950s by Consolidated Edison (the gas and electric utility in New York City) about excavation work it was doing to lay or repair pipes or cables. A 1953 issue of The New Yorker provides the following jokey item:

Insight Into the Creative Life Note: The man who invented the phrase "Dig We Must" for the Con Edison Company's street barricades was paying his gas bill when the idea came to him.

Over the next decade or so, the slogan “Dig We Must” became familiar nationwide (I first saw it in an issue of Mad Magazine in the mid-1960s, in a cartoon where a vaguely beatnik-looking character was holding a sign consisting of those three words). The point of the slogan was something like “Progress is inexorable, but it requires investing money and labor in infrastructure improvements. “ And writers and speakers invoked it in connection with everything from the spirit of lunar exploration to the need to assess the effectiveness of War on Poverty programs.

In the title to his op-ed piece, Paul Krugman intends to contrast the can-do spirit of the old Con Ed slogan, with the modern hostility to infrastructure investment, which he says has prevailed throughout the U.S. economy’s attempted recovery from the bursting of the Housing Bubble in 2008. Hence, “Build We Won’t.”

share|improve this answer
This is what I was struggling to remember. I have deleted my flawed answer. – James McLeod Jul 5 '14 at 10:27

A more conventional way of saying "Build we won't" is "We won't build."

But the verb build is put in front, ahead of the subject "we," for emphasis.

Another way of expressing this is, "Build. We won't."

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.