English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am writing a scientific paper and want to dedicate it to my former supervisor who passed away recently. The standard practice in this case is to write the dedication phrase just below the title of the paper. What I am not sure as I am a non-native speaker is the exact wording. It would be terrible if I write something offensive or inappropriate out of my ignorance. I have the following suggestions:

  1. To the memory of ...
  2. Dedicated to the bright memory of ...
  3. Dedicated to the memory of ...

My questions are

  1. Is option 1 ok without the word "dedicated"?
  2. Is the word "bright" fine here? I like this choice, but my worry is that it might be reserved for the people who were very close to him, or "bright" would imply some strange meaning that I am unaware of.
  3. What would you write?
share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted
  1. Omitting “dedicated” as in “To the memory of …” is accepted usage, attested for example by a Google Scholar search.
  2. On using “bright”, it depends strongly on your relationship with the deceased. If unsure, it may be best to proceed cautiously: people grieving undergo a lot of stress, and can have harsh and somewhat unpredictable reaction. The question to ask yourself is: by leaving it out, do you feel that your homage is lessened?
  3. Unless I knew him and knew what he felt like, in a very public place like a scholarly publication, I would go for something traditional. But then, I'm not the most demonstrative kind of chap.
share|improve this answer

I would recommend going with something simple:

In memory of [name].

which NOAD lists as

in memory of intended to remind people of, esp. to honor a dead person.

That you are writing a dedication is understood, and does not need to be explicit.

share|improve this answer

protected by Rathony May 31 at 5:21

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.