Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider:

Where = here

When = now

What = this

How = thus

Why = (this is why)??

With the above, you could answer a question with the word on the left with just the single word on the right as an answer without additional information when the context is implicit, or can be provided with non-verbal cues such as pointing or demonstrating.

Is there a single word answer to the question "why?" to describe this reason or this is why when the context is implicit? Both therefore and because are inadequate as they require additional information.

If not, does anyone know if other languages perhaps do have a single word for this?

share|improve this question
2  
How I have most often heard why questions answered with a single word is: because, without additional information. –  GMB Jun 19 at 18:07
    
@GMB Does it really answer a question? –  Archa Jun 19 at 18:08
5  
No, it doesn't - but neither does "thus" answer "how?" Your "when" and "where" examples offer a single-word value that answers the question. All of the others require additional information. If you have a single-word reason, then it will answer "why?" –  bye Jun 19 at 18:15
    
@bye Turn your above comment into an answer. It is the answer to this question, and even points out the error in the question itself. –  Chris Mukherjee Jun 19 at 18:19
1  
I wonder if behind this question somewhere there's a parent or teacher with a habit of insisting that "because" is not a complete sentence (or some such attempt at disguising as grammar a problem that is actually behavioral). The fact remains that "here" is no more (or less) complete an answer than "because"; any difference between them is physical, not linguistic. –  JPmiaou Jun 19 at 19:30

6 Answers 6

up vote 1 down vote accepted

A seldom used alternative to because and therefore, is wherefore.

If you want good examples, read the works of Shakespeare.

share|improve this answer
1  
Indeed, it seems that this is the best fit (it has nothing to do with our current use of "where", see dictionary.reference.com/browse/wherefore ). Even though it is equivalent to "therefore", "therefore" as @Bye pointed out is used mostly used in an "it follows that" manner, whereas "wherefore" could be used as a single word if the reason is clear from current action or context. –  AndyHasIt Jun 20 at 11:28

Actually, because is very often used.

Yes, it requires more information, but so does thus! If I ask how you did something and you answer me: "thus," I will know as much as when I ask you why and you tell me: "because."

Another word you could use is hence, meaning as a consequence, for this reason. It is used in the inverse way of because:

We bought ice cream because it was warm and we needed to cool down.
It was warm and we needed to cool down; hence, we bought ice cream.

It may appear a bit archaic or formal though. Personally I would prefer it as the one-word reply to why, rather than because. But I am weird in that.

share|improve this answer
    
I like "hence", though it suffers the same association to "it follows that" as therefore does (as highlighted by @bye). I suppose "because" suffers from association with the childish use of not providing a reason... –  AndyHasIt Jun 19 at 19:23

How I have most often heard why questions answered with a single word is: because, without additional information. It may not answer a question in terms of an explanation, but if only one word is to be used, a more commonly used one may not be available. And, common use is at least some of the time based on collective common sense. Especially for why questions that aren't strictly answerable in the first place, because is a response to the question, even if it does prompt a further inquiry.

share|improve this answer

"Why" is asking about the reason of something happened . so , if you want to show the reason of this "something" you can't reply with only one word . i mean you must explain it . and if you don't want to show the reason i think "causeless" fits your needs .

share|improve this answer

Reason.

[Silly filler chars go here.]

share|improve this answer
    
I like this. Perhaps it might fit better with "where" -> location, "when -> time, "what" -> object (?), "how" -> manner, "why" -> reason. But it's nice to have an alternative to because. Kids sure would like it better. –  medica Jun 20 at 5:14

I think that you can't answer such a question with a single word. It requires additional information, an explanation.

­If not, does anyone know if other languages perhaps do have a single word for this?

Not me.

share|improve this answer
2  
Thanks for the answer, but that logic would also apply to a "how" question which you could answer with "thus". "thus" when used as a single word needs to be accompanied by some additional information, typically non-verbal. –  AndyHasIt Jun 19 at 18:00
2  
@AndyHasIt - you can also say "because" and point. There is an archaic use of therefore (which answers wherefore), but therefore has semantically drifted to meaning something more like "it follows that" (sequitur) than the original "because". –  bye Jun 19 at 18:08
1  
@bye or you can say "Because" and not point. Parents of three-year-olds are driven to this shift daily. –  Brian Donovan Jun 19 at 18:11
1  
Of course you can answer a question that way. If the answer isn't is a good one is not necessary. –  Oldcat Jun 20 at 0:21

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.