Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am referring to the stage where someone reaches his/her capabilities limits, especially professional limits. I am thinking about career advancements as well as the growth in professional life. We all reach our limit in that progress and going further would be unnatural or might put us in a difficult position because we are not able to cope with a higher level of abilities or responsibilities. Is there a word or expression to define this limit in personal progress?

share|improve this question

6 Answers 6

up vote 12 down vote accepted

Medica's answer pointing to the Peter Principle is on the money, however just to add a phrase or two...

colloquially: maxed out, plateaued, sweet spot

Having "risen to his level of incompetence" refers to having gone beyond Jack's referred to territory of competence. "Out of his depths" would similarly express having risen above that territory.

share|improve this answer
5  
+1 On the affirmative side, you could say She's reached her pinnacle (or the pinnacle of her success). –  bib Jun 16 at 1:23
    
+1 for "plateaued" –  josh314 Jun 16 at 21:04

Actually, you are describing the Peter Principle to a "T".

The Peter Principle is the principle that "in a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to their level of incompetence".

Formulated by Dr. Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull in the late 60's,

The Peter Principle is a special case of a ubiquitous observation: anything that works will be used in progressively more challenging applications until it fails. There is much temptation to use what has worked before, even when it may exceed its effective scope. Dr. Peter observed this about humans.

[Similarly] members of a hierarchical organization eventually are promoted to their highest level of competence, after which further promotion raises them to incompetence. That level is the employee's "level of incompetence" where the employee has no chance of further promotion, thus reaching their career's ceiling in an organization.

The Principle further states that the work of that person who has reached their level of incompetence tends to be done by those below him who are better equipped. Managing upward is the idea that a better-suited subordinate finds ways to subtly "manage" superiors in order to limit the damage that they end up doing.

The employee's incompetence is not necessarily exposed as a result of the higher-ranking position being more difficult — simply, that job is different from the job in which the employee previously excelled, and thus requires different work skills, which the employee may not possess. For example, a factory worker's excellence in their job can earn them promotion to manager, at which point the skills that earned them their promotion no longer apply to their job.

On an very public level, the disastrous response by FEMA to Hurricane Katrina was shown to be the result of FEMA Director Michael D. Brown's being a victim of a poor promotion. Brown had excelled in his previous position, and naturally was given a job with greater responsibilities by President G.W. Bush.

Brown was vilified by the media, but it's difficult not to commiserate with him. He was good at his previous job, and -- as is dictated by the American Dream -- when offered a position with more prestige, salary and potential for growth, he took it. The person who gave him the job had faith in his abilities, so why shouldn't he take the job? But Brown proves that a promotion isn't always a good thing.

This seems to match well your statement that "We all reach our limit in that progress and going further would be unnatural or might put us in a difficult position because we are not able to cope with a higher level of abilities or responsibilities.

Whether it has a more succinct or different name, I don't know. I've only ever heard this referred to as the Peter Principle.

You might describe it non-specifically: you've exhausted your potential, reached your limits of expertise, you'll be in over your head, etc.

share|improve this answer
    
I have to disagree. The PP is that you've been promoted beyond the zone at which you're competent and can be useful, into a zone where you're out of your depth, doing more damage than good. That doesn't sound like the OP case, where it sounds like you are in a zone where you are at maximum effectiveness, and any promotion beyond that would make you leave your effective zone. Anyway, the OP needs to define whether the person in question is actually still in their "effective" zone, or has been promoted beyond it into an "ineffective" zone (and the PP has come into play). –  Phil Perry Jun 16 at 16:21
    
At this point the employee is "out of their depth" or "in too deep" –  Preston Fitzgerald Jun 16 at 19:50
    
@PhilPerry Hmm, you're right. The OP recognized he's on the threshold of the Peter Principle. –  medica Jun 16 at 20:02

Fulfilled your potential

That might be the most neutral, least provocative way of expressing this idea.

maxed out and plateaued

Are good suggestions from @MarkKasson, although they may be slightly pejorative.

sweet spot

Also from @MarkKasson's answer, is not correct IMO. This expression has nothing to do with reaching a limit - it simply means you've gotten something "exactly right"; "the stars were perfectly aligned"; "everything came together".

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for maxed out. –  BigHomie Jun 16 at 18:09
    
@BigHomie maxed out is not mine! It's from the first answer, as cited in my answer. –  Vector Jun 16 at 19:22
2  
haha I tldr'd that one, so you get the rep! –  BigHomie Jun 16 at 19:28
    
Vector, in hindsight, you're right regarding "sweet spot" when taken literally. I was thinking of using it a bit more euphemistically (perhaps even sarcastically). Not a proper answer for OP though. I may have to downvote myself. –  Mark Kasson Jun 16 at 23:18
1  
@MarkKasson I may have to downvote myself - no need to go to extremes! You could edit though, if you care to. I didn't downvote you. In particular, plateaued is excellent. I just upvoted you for that one. –  Vector Jun 17 at 1:06

I have reached a peak in my career.

share|improve this answer
    
This isn't a bad example, but could be expanded. –  dwjohnston Jun 16 at 5:15
1  
Alternately, "I've peaked". –  Henry Keiter Jun 16 at 18:45

Jack,

I am thinking about career advancements as well as the growth in professional life.

The Peter Principle is way off. You are describing a situation where you want to progress, right? Also, you say that it is 'personal progress'...?

Personal Progress

If you are concerned about your own personal abilities to become a person who can learn to advance, or adapt to the demands of being more creative/organized/productive, then that is a personal development issue. You might be frazzled at your limit, and raising the bar might make you feel worse, as you would feel you couldn't perform at 100% even with your best efforts...

Professional Progress

If you are concerned about your career being stonewalled, or hitting a dead end, or any of the other terms, then it is a matter of being the kind of person that will fill any void of opportunity. That is, you will get bored/sloppy/lazy if you go to work on auto-pilot.

I see a lot of folks stay in one position forever. They have a job. Others are completely unsatisfied where they are, and are continually moving up... They have a career.

Avoiding the risk of pissing off the moderators for ending an answer with a question mark (however professional/polite it is):

Ask yourself what type of person you are, and you will know what kind of professional you are.

pat :)

share|improve this answer

You might say that one has reached their capacity to improve.

share|improve this answer
    
Not a terrible answer. –  dwjohnston Jun 16 at 22:38

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.