English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm reading a news article about a male police officer and the author calls him a "policeman." This word seems unsophisticated to me, but is it still sexist if it refers to a man?

share|improve this question
Refers to a man? Wash your mouth out. – Edwin Ashworth May 25 '14 at 23:02
That’s why some people say police officer, since police is itself a “plurale tantum”, something of a defective class with no singular, and so must be used attributively to get at a singular sense for it. – tchrist May 25 '14 at 23:10
Please see english.stackexchange.com/questions/30455/…. – Pockets May 25 '14 at 23:54
How is it sexist? He is a man who works for the police - Policeman is a perfectly good term. If the officer was a woman and the article called her a policewoman, would that be sexist too? – Lego Stormtroopr Dec 21 '14 at 6:17

Yes it is gender-exclusive, but that need not always lead us to recoil in utter horror. “Stewards must always offer any pregnant passenger assistance with her luggage” is also gender-exclusive, but I will personally undertake to assuage the hurt feelings of any pregnant male passengers who feel affronted by the wording of this guideline.

share|improve this answer
Speaking as a fisherperson, . . . – Michael Owen Sartin May 25 '14 at 23:45
I was long ago an angler, till I became a diver. – Brian Donovan May 25 '14 at 23:47

Policeman is quite common in reference to male police officers, and I do not think I would even notice it. For that matter, the corresponding form policewoman is not uncommon. For example, here are some recent uses in The New York Times:

Staring up at the steep and lifeless brown ridges looming over the valley, Gulzar Ahmad Dar, a boyish and chatty Kashmiri policeman, sighed at having drawn a short straw. [link]

As soon as my passport was stamped, a policewoman strode over, said she had a text message for me and, though I laughed at her scam, requested a tip. [link]

[…] a woman from Canada who says a handful of French policemen raped her in Paris in April. [link]

[…] he said that Muslims who were responsible for vandalizing police vehicles, damaging public property and attacking policewomen during a rally in 2011 “will not be spared”. [link]

As to whether this is “still sexist” — that seems very subjective to me, and depends greatly on the political and cultural context. You will need to decide for yourself how you feel about these usages.

share|improve this answer

Several people have suggested the use of the term "police officer" but we must be careful not to create confusion with non-human police actors such as dogs and AI systems.

To be specific, a police canine is often given an officer rank. If it is attacked or bitten that is treated as an offense against a serving office.

We need to say "a canine police officer" or a "human police officer" to clarify our specific case. This will grow more important as AI officers are deployed more widely.

share|improve this answer

Another suggestion would be police officer as a more gender-neutral term.

share|improve this answer
Indeed. I note that the question itself uses the phrase male police officer. – ruakh May 25 '14 at 23:16
-1 This is not an answer. Perhaps you could post it as a comment? – Jimi Oke May 26 '14 at 1:25
You are correct that 'police officer' is the term of the politically correct and policeman/policewoman are now considered retro and incorrect usage. – Third News May 26 '14 at 2:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.