Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 2 down vote favorite

This question appeared in a previous question.
Should I write "it stands without reason that accuracy is of utmost importance" or "it stands to reason that accuracy is of utmost importance?"

The latter is the only I can find in online dictionaries.

share|improve this question
1  
"doubt" and "former" also appear to be used wrongly here. – Ben Voigt Mar 21 '11 at 22:14
@John: That's a question in its own right. But I will try to answer in the space allowed for a comment: Your usage is wrong because "doubt" is not equivalent to "question" or "inquiry". It is the stated opinion, expressed from expertise, that another statement is likely false. It should therefore have an antecedent after a manner of speaking, either the expert who is qualified to express doubt (I have my doubts about...) or the rationale for disbelief. Furthermore, when used as a noun it is generally plural (see above), but usage as a verb is usually clearer. – Ben Voigt Mar 21 '11 at 22:25
1  
It appears you're using "doubt" when you mean "question". This is nonstandard usage, common in India, but bordering-on-incorrect elsewhere. – Marthaª Mar 21 '11 at 22:25
@John: An example absent the expert but instead indicating rationale: "The plaintiff's prior history of spurious actions cast doubt concerning whether the newest lawsuit was brought in good faith." – Ben Voigt Mar 21 '11 at 22:29
1  
english.stackexchange.com/questions/2429/… "doubt" is used by Indian English speakers. But I would still argue that it's merely a common mistake, not a part of the language. – tenfour Mar 21 '11 at 22:34
show 2 more comments

2 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

The common idiom is "It stands to reason", meaning "It makes sense" or "It is expected". I've never seen any other variant, and at least some internet resources show the same.

share|improve this answer
3  
Agree. Seems to me "without reason" would be saying the opposite of what is intended. – Kelly C Hess Mar 21 '11 at 20:40
up vote 0 down vote

"It stands to reason that ..." Is basically a synonym for "Based on the reasoning provided, ...". For example,

He treated you like dirt! It stands to reason that you're having second thoughts!

"It stands without reason that ..." I have always understood to mean, "It needs no explanation that ...". For example,

It stands without reason that he should treat you like a princess.

But as we have seen, this idiom doesn't appear in any significant usage on the Internet so it could be a regionalism or just my own mistake. If it were my paper, I would use "it needs no explanation".

share|improve this answer
@tenfour: I want to say "It needs no explanation that ...". In this case is "It stands to reason" incorrect? – John Assymptoth Mar 21 '11 at 22:33
You've made a typo in "it needs to explanation". – Cerberus Mar 21 '11 at 22:35
For me, there's enough doubt that I would avoid it. – tenfour Mar 21 '11 at 22:36
@Cerebrus, bleh I should just leave this site for the day. But I would argue that you should just edit my mistake instead of pointing it out in a comment. – tenfour Mar 21 '11 at 22:37
Several online dictionaries present this definition for "It stands to reason": It's reasonable or to be expected. For example, It stands to reason that if we leave late we'll arrive late. – John Assymptoth Mar 21 '11 at 22:43
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.