English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

What do we call person who buys or collects branded things like shirts, shoes, cars etc...

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by FumbleFingers, ermanen, Kristina Lopez, RyeɃreḁd, ghoppe May 21 '14 at 22:33

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

A collector? ... – Oldcat May 21 '14 at 17:47
If he does it at gunpoint – a brandit. – Edwin Ashworth May 21 '14 at 18:32
Could you be more specific? Only buys things of certain brands? Only buys brand-names (of all things)? Or only buys things of one brand? – Simon Sarris May 21 '14 at 20:39

Materialistic is the most apt term I can think of:

ma·te·ri·al·ism: a way of thinking that gives too much importance to material possessions rather than to spiritual or intellectual things

The term sneakerhead also comes to mind, but describes nowhere near what you're trying to describe. From the related Wikipedia entry:

A sneakerhead is a person who collects, trades or admires sneakers as a form of hobby. A sneakerhead may also be highly experienced in distinguishing between real and fake replica sneakers.

share|improve this answer
Consumerist would also work. – njboot May 21 '14 at 21:28

I think that we can him/her a 'Fashion victim collector'

share|improve this answer

I would call that person a brand slave or a brand whore.

brand slave: someone who buys and prominently displays name brand products (or products that feature large corporate polos, e.g. Ralph Lauren's Big Pony) under the belief that such loyalty to a label or corporation is a cachet and brings prestige to their otherwise lack of taste, regardless of the actual quality or value of the product.

share|improve this answer
The term is unfortunately, a bit vulgar. – dwjohnston May 21 '14 at 22:31
@user1068446 Indeed. But "brand slave" is not. – Elian May 21 '14 at 22:33
You can be materialistic and not care about brands. – Elian May 22 '14 at 0:16

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.