Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In singular English say:

The thing is an end in itself.

How does plural look like then?

The things are the ends in themselves.

Am I right?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by FumbleFingers, TimLymington, RyeɃreḁd, cornbread ninja 麵包忍者, tchrist May 15 at 1:33

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. A list of these references can be found here: List of general references" – FumbleFingers, TimLymington, RyeɃreḁd, cornbread ninja 麵包忍者, tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
When you use an indefinite article in the singular, there is no need to change to a definite article in the plural. The plural of the indefinite article is a zero article: a house => houses, an apple, apples. –  oerkelens May 14 at 11:59
1  
I think it's General Reference that the things themselves can be self-justifying individually or collectively, and anyone who's thinking of using the definite article in either context should be asking questions on English Language Learners, not here. –  FumbleFingers May 14 at 12:18
    
OK, I didn't notice English Language Learners at StackExchange before. –  TA_Kosice May 14 at 19:19
    

3 Answers 3

It's done like this as well: Peace, love and understanding are ends in themselves, and Mr. Costello is to be commended for advocating them.

share|improve this answer
    
Similar but different. This is an answer to a different question. –  david6 May 14 at 21:57

The things are an end in themselves. -- ('respectively' being understood.)

share|improve this answer
    
Isn't that ambiguous between whether they're a single collective end or each is an individually an end? –  Racheet May 14 at 13:18
1  
Contrast: Peace, love and understanding are an end in themselves. (single collective end) –  Racheet May 14 at 13:19
1  
Killing badgers, kissing babies and defrauding the public are an end in themselves (multiple individual ends) –  Racheet May 14 at 13:20
    
It's clear from context in my examples, but it isn't clear grammatically. –  Racheet May 14 at 13:20
1  
Similarly: John and Marsha are an item. A toothbrush and a can are items. –  Kyle Hale May 14 at 15:36

These things are ends in themselves -- if each 'thing' being referred to is itself an individual end.

The things are an end in themselves -- if the 'things' are collectively an end.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.