English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why not to use Magic Quotes.

Why not use Magic Quotes.

What is the difference in meaning between these two ways of phrasing that sentence? To me the first sentence sounds like it tells the reader that there are good reasons not to use Magic Quotes (a programming feature) and those reasons will be given. The second one sounds like a rhetorical question, something along the lines of "What the heck not? Let's use them!" Am I right?

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The difference is in the way not affects the sentence due to the presence of the to.

Why (not to use) Magic Quotes.

(Why not) use Magic Quotes.

In the former, the not negates the to use, making the meaning an explanation of why using Magic Quotes is not something you want to do.

In the latter, the not negates the why, making the meaning a rhetorical question

share|improve this answer
@tchrist Apologies, my StackOverflow is leaking. I'll make sure to avoid it in future. – Latty Oct 10 '14 at 9:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.