Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Such a person doesn't mind losing or winning; however, they dislike having to experience resistance/confrontation. To clarify, such a person does not necessarily "fear" confrontation but thinks confrontation is too much of a hassle.

Let's make a point that finds confrontation too much of a hassle is the primary meaning.

— A clarifying treat for those who get it; otherwise, insightful nonetheless:

"If I don't have to do it, I won't. If I have to do it, I'll make it quick."

share|improve this question
2  
"hates" confrontation or "fears" confrontation?? –  Gary's Student Apr 29 at 15:00
1  
Apparently, "almost-everyone-in-my-school". :) –  haneefmubarak Apr 29 at 22:37
    
Hmmm... Coward sprang to mind from you question title. It still marginally applies, as one definition for coward is a lack of courage to endure dangerous or unpleasant things. But there are probably more applicable terms. –  Patrick M Apr 30 at 3:34
    
A grown and experienced person doesn't have any feelings for confrontation, neither fear nor joy. Also, hate and dislike come from negative feelings associated with the confrontation, so it's still fear, albeit less concentrated. Confronting or getting confronted by someone a meaningful number of times will cause this hate and dislike to disappear, so it's a temporary condition and the person shouldn't be named anything but inexperienced. –  Luka Ramishvili Apr 30 at 6:37
    
Related. –  tchrist Jun 7 at 20:43

11 Answers 11

up vote 5 down vote accepted

"Conflict-averse" is the term we use for this in the human services professions.

share|improve this answer
2  
Could you provide any references or quotes to back up your answer? Thank you. –  Mari-Lou A Apr 30 at 4:32
    
+1 this is definitely the phrase that leaped to mind when I saw this question. –  LessPop_MoreFizz Apr 30 at 5:08

I think the easiest word is non-confrontational.

I would also suggest the following:

  • carefree
  • nonchalant
  • indifferent
share|improve this answer
2  
It was as simple as tacking a "non" to it; whenever English isn't complicated it is just straight-forward :b –  user2738698 Apr 29 at 15:26
8  
Non-confrontational sounds more accurate than carefree or indifferent. A person could be be carefree or indifferent but still be confrontational. –  Keni Apr 29 at 15:30
1  
@Keni - the idea of being carefree is not caring. If you don't care what would you be confrontational about? Indifferent is the same thing. –  RyeɃreḁd Apr 29 at 15:32
1  
@Jack - very very common. Especially in speech. –  RyeɃreḁd Apr 29 at 15:33
1  
@user2738698, non-confrontational is what you are looking for. "carefree", "nonchalant" and "indifferent" don't necessarily mean the same as non-confrontational. –  Mew Apr 29 at 23:25

Consider placid, unconfrontational, and easygoing.

placid: indisturbed by tumult or disorder; calm.

unconfrontational: not confrontational.

share|improve this answer
    
Dead link. (15char) –  ValekHalfHeart Apr 29 at 16:26
    
The link is misspelled with an 'm' where there should be an 'n'. thefreedictionary.com/conciliating –  piCookie Apr 29 at 16:31
    
Great word to add to my vocabulary. Thanks, Elian! –  user67261 Apr 29 at 20:25
2  
While this is a good answer, it seems to add meaning on top of what was requested. Someone who dislikes conflict does not necessarily take action to lessen conflict. –  Michael Mior Apr 30 at 2:32
2  
I agree with @MichaelMior this is not really what the question was. A conciliatory person is a peacemaker. Someone who is uniting two sides that are fighting possibly. So they do get involved in conflict, but as "counselor". –  RyeɃreḁd Apr 30 at 8:36

Peaceable refers to a person who likes to be left in peace, but doesn't imply weakness.

share|improve this answer

You could call that person "agreeable" or "passive"? - as in, they will go along with what another person wants, whether they want to really or not, in order to avoid confrontation.

share|improve this answer

Evasive. Or non-confrontational. Whatever works!

share|improve this answer
2  
Welcome to EL&U. On this and other sites in the Stack Exchange network, we are expected to provide not merely an answer, but an explanation of the answer, with links to suitable references. I encourage you to take the site tour and visit the help center for additional guidance. –  choster Apr 29 at 22:14

I suggest we coin "anticonfrontationalist"

share|improve this answer
    
Please provide a definition; it may very well fit the word I seek and checks may be shuffled around, if you know what I mean ;D –  user2738698 Apr 30 at 4:10
1  
how about profrontation-alist –  mcalex Apr 30 at 5:56

A couple that spring to mind, depending on context.

Compliant: disposed to agree with others or obey rules, especially to an excessive degree. Similarly, acquiescent, docile. These indicate someone who will avoid confrontation by agreeing with something disagreeable.

Passive-resistance (or resistor): is the practice of achieving goals ... without using violence. This is a better fit for someone who still disagrees with the disagreeable thing, but wishes to avoid confrontation while bringing about change.

share|improve this answer

Depending on who you ask, it could be either a diplomat or a sissy.

share|improve this answer

I have always used the word amiable:

a·mi·a·ble [ey-mee-uh-b uh l]

adjective

  1. having or showing pleasant, good-natured personal qualities; affable: an amiable disposition.
  2. friendly; sociable: an amiable greeting; an amiable gathering.
  3. agreeable; willing to accept the wishes, decisions, or suggestions of another or others.

It's antonyms would definitely describe one that is confrontational:

1. rude. 2. unfriendly, hostile.

share|improve this answer

When this creates an obstacle to function or communication, the verbiage in the DSM of the APA is 'avoidant' as in the "Avoidant Personality Disorder", or the paradoxical "Avoidant Attachment".

It differs from conflict-aversion as the basis of a Social Phobia, in that the person avoiding does it habitually, or in the spirit of excessive detachment, not out of (aware) fear.

(That is why this almost always ends up as an Axis II thing, and not a primary disorder.)

share|improve this answer

protected by tchrist Apr 30 at 23:22

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.