Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Some co-workers of mine from another office play a "question game." I wasn't there for the question, but here it is:

Is it accidentally impregnating someone if you know you're trying to get her pregnant, but she doesn't?

It's obviously not accidental. Is there a word for this situation?

Edit #1: I mean a word for the whole situation, not just switching accidental for another word.

share|improve this question
    
Surely the word accidentally is de trop. If it is non consensual, then it is rape. –  KCH Apr 17 at 16:45
    
Consider malice aforethought and deceit. Your hypothetical situation may not be criminal, but it certainly unethical and immoral. –  Patrick M Apr 17 at 18:46
1  
@PatrickM In the U.S. and Canada at least, it is illegal, has happened, charges have been pressed, and people have been convicted. This has happened both ways (woman claiming she's on birth control but isn't, both sexes sabotaging a condom, etc). –  Doc Apr 17 at 19:35

6 Answers 6

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Intentional: done deliberately; intended
deliberate: done with or marked by full consciousness of the nature and effects
calculated: undertaken after careful estimation of the likely outcome
premeditated: characterized by deliberate purpose, previous consideration, and some degree of planning
I would call this behavior insidious (stealthy, subtle, cunning, or treacherous) or duplicitous (given to or marked by deliberate deceptiveness in behavior or speech).

He duplicitously impregnated her against her will.

share|improve this answer
    
I may have been unclear in my question. I edited it to be more clear. You are definitely correct though. –  Carlos Bribiescas Apr 17 at 15:49

Not a single word that I know of, but the expression accidentally on purpose can be used for situations like that.

share|improve this answer

The whole situation? Sexual assault

share|improve this answer
    
This was the first thing I thought of as well. –  medica Apr 17 at 21:03
    
It seems from the description that the sex is consensual, but not the impregnation. Sexual assault tends to be used more for rape and similar non-consensual acts. –  IQAndreas Apr 18 at 6:31

This scenario reminds me of a discussion that came up years ago in a torts class at law school. In U.S. tort law, certain claims fall under the heading "wrongful death." But as our professor told us in connection with a hypothetical case involving a woman suing the maker of a birth control pill for its failure to work, "'Wrongful life' is not a recognized category of tort."

In any event, the closest I can come to describing the pregnancy in your scenario is as "partially unexpected." The impregnation itself, on the other hand, might be termed "insidiously conceived."

share|improve this answer

Wrongful conception: In a wrongful conception case, the plaintiffs claim that their doctor negligently performed a vasectomy, tubal ligation, or other sterilization procedure, resulting in an unwanted pregnancy and/or birth. The resulting child is usually healthy, though unwanted.[24]

I'm unsure if there is case law against a partner based on deception but it would not be sexual assault. The example stated the female partner was ignorant of the male partner's attempt at impregnation, not coitus.

share|improve this answer
1  
It is definitely sexual assault in the US and Canada. Consensual sex that is conditioned on the use of contraception is sexual assault if either party intentional and surreptitiously tampers with birth control because the conditions under which consent to sex were given have been violated therefore the sex act is deemed to have been non-consensual. The person who tampers with the birth control knows that it is non-consensual. This is not hypothetical. People have gone to jail for this precise scenario. –  Aaron K Apr 18 at 9:42
1  
    
Where is the US case law? –  Third News Apr 18 at 10:06
    
Correction, it is only so in Canada. US law does not include contraception in the standing definition of consent. California is considering legislation. –  Aaron K Apr 18 at 10:24
    
This has veered off into a direction that wasn't intended... (But somewhat expected) –  Carlos Bribiescas Apr 18 at 12:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.