English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm not a native English speaker. So, I was wondering about what you might think of a title like this. It sounds a bit too much to me. Calling something that's already "super" as total.

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by onomatomaniak, Mahnax, Mitch, yoozer8, waiwai933 Aug 19 '12 at 4:49

Questions on English Language & Usage Stack Exchange are expected to relate to English language and usage within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

To avoid speculation, I suggest you post the context and reference. – Kris Jan 13 '12 at 6:14

The term for this is 'hyperbole', and sports reporting is rife with it.

share|improve this answer

I'm afraid that's rather the point of it; naming for marketing reasons.

It's no better than super-duper-mega-ultra league.

Just combining comparatives and superlatives to gain additional mileage.

share|improve this answer

Depends. Perhaps the idea was to say that it entirely deserves (total) to be called a super-league, unlike some which may undeservingly call themselves so. 'Total', as in 'total recall'.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.