Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A recent discussion came up in GameDev that suggests that when you are using apostrope for abbreviations, that the correct apostrophe to use when typing is the backtick. On US Keyboards below the escape-key — left of the 1 key)

Questions about the difference between the single-quote, and the apostrophe have come up before, but they do not address whether the apostrophe should be typed as if it is a single-quote, or it should be typed as a backtick.

Which of the following are (more) correct:

Itˋs common sense that a student darenˋt interrupt its professor!

or

It’s common sense that a student daren’t interrupt its professor!

share|improve this question
    
Thanks for incriminating me, man! –  Pip Apr 13 at 23:48
1  
In English, "it" is rarely used to refer to humans... but that's a different problem, discussed elsewhere. –  keshlam Apr 14 at 2:02

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

A backtick would be my last recommendation. A straight single-quote is acceptable, and a curly close quote can be substituted as an improvement. In other words, of these three:

  • It`s common sense. . . .
  • It's common sense. . . .
  • It’s common sense. . . .

I would avoid the first, accept the second, and consider the third to be superior to the other two.

One website says the backtick:

shouldn't be used in place of the opening single quote, or for any other discernible typographic purpose

and goes on to say that the closing single quote is:

the preferred character to use as an apostrophe, as in I’m coming, or He’s with me.

It also mentions that the ASCII apostrophe:

shouldn't really ever be used in proper typography, but is often used because it's easy to type and well supported.

share|improve this answer
    
As a footnote, more information on this subject is available here. –  J.R. Apr 14 at 0:34
3  
As a footnote to the footnote: Speaking as a typographer, I agree that the single-quote is preferable. Speaking as someone who has to worry about the portability of document from system to system -- and who has worked with a lot of systems that don't support anything more than ASCII -- I have to strongly recommend the ASCII apostrophe unless you know the document will never be re-edited using different software. –  keshlam Apr 14 at 2:04

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.