Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What should I call someone who has a tendency towards monologues? Would "monologist" be a logical neologism?

share|improve this question
1  
Half-serious answer: a supervillain? :) –  maniacyak Mar 18 '11 at 22:03

4 Answers 4

soliloquist ?

It is cited in the Merriam-Webster's.

As for the fact that it would apply to dramatic art, that's perfectly true. That's actually the same for "monologue" the origin of which lies also in dramatic art.

  • Monologue comes from the Greek μονόλογο - μονός (alone) - λόγος (discourse) and is a common rhetoric style in Greek dramatic art.

  • Soliloquy comes from Late Latin soliloquium, (solus alone + loqui to speak) and is also common in this specifically Latin genre: satire.

There is however, a slight difference between these two words.

You can engage in a monologue in front of somebody who will just stay silent or nod. Greek plays monologues often addressed the audience. But basically you speak aloud because you intend to be listened to.

To soliloquise is instead, just to think aloud in front of nobody. In the case of a play, it's just a dramatic device so that the audience can share the character's thoughts (numerous examples in William Shakespeare's plays). In real life however, it is obviously unnecessary and can therefore sometimes be considered inane.

As a conclusion if your character makes a long speech in front of some auditor, then he could be called a "monologist" whereas if he is just thinking aloud with only his own ears around, then he should be called a "soliloquist".

One last word.
I initially thought that soliloquy was also a medical term. I could find no evidence for this. At least in English.
It is in French though: ("En médecine, on parle de soliloquie lorsqu'un individu ayant des troubles de la personnalité et du comportement se parle à lui-même").

share|improve this answer
    
isn't that only an actor? i want something from the same root as monologue. –  user6043 Mar 12 '11 at 20:17
    
@Henry. You are absolutely right. But there is a lot to be aid in this regard. I've updated my answer to cover this aspect better. –  Alain Pannetier Φ Mar 12 '11 at 22:06
    
Soliloquist is in the Merriam-Webster's dictionary. –  Peter Shor May 11 '11 at 22:55
    
@PeterShor, Good to know. I was not that off the mark then. –  Alain Pannetier Φ May 12 '11 at 1:16
1  
Best answer. Unless the person in question has super-powers and is evil, in which case, "super-villain" or "arch-villain" would be more appropriate. (Pop-culture reference to The Incredibles.) –  Wayne May 12 '11 at 13:42

I assume that “a narcissist” wasn't what you were looking for.

I would argue against “monologist” because my first instinct was to read that as somebody who studies monology (whatever that might be). “Monologue” and “soliloquy” are certainly distinct things in drama, but there are plenty of technical terms used in a fuzzy way by the general public. I think “soliloquist” is fine, even if it might be a neologism.

share|improve this answer
  • loquacious
  • garrulous
  • logorrheic
  • discursive
  • uninterruptible
  • blowhard
  • deaf

Though not directly an answer to you question (these are mostly adjectives), they still imply what you want.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.