English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a phrase or word in the English language that describes a statement or a discourse that seems meaningless or so broad it lacks value?

For example

Society grows best when those who plant trees don't expect to sit in shade.

While the sentence is cohesive, I personally find it meaningless. Is there a word to describe this? Saying this statement is trivial wouldn't be correct, as the implications are not obvious.

Basically I'm asking what's a politically correct synonym for saying something is "bullshit".

Another example is this quote

We are prisoners in the present, locked in eternal transition between our past and our future.

Perhaps in context it's meaningful but to arbitrarily say we are prisoners of the present, I personally find is idiotic.

share|improve this question
Why do you describe this as 'an ineligible sentence'? I don't incidentally, find it meaningless. In fact it seems quite profound. It means that where people who never have the expectation of using the things that society is creating do the 'planting', then a more long-term perspective can be taken. Slower-growing, and hence more substantial trees will be planted. Hence in those conditions society will grow best. I would be interested to know who said it. – WS2 Mar 19 '14 at 21:57
@WS2 I saw it on facebook. If you're interested I asked the author and he said it meant "One must work for the future, not just for them-self." Very well some people may find it meaningful, I was trying to give an example of one that is meaningless to help find the word I was looking for. No offense intended. – Celeritas Mar 19 '14 at 22:13
I think you mean "legible" not "eligible" – Adriano Varoli Piazza Mar 20 '14 at 19:39
I'd call that second one mock profound. – TRiG Mar 20 '14 at 20:22

22 Answers 22


The Free Dictionary says

  1. a. Lacking intelligence; stupid. b. Devoid of substance or meaning; inane ...
share|improve this answer

I'm not sure it's exactly what you're looking for but you might call such a saying a platitude.

share|improve this answer
Empty platitudes, in fact. – tchrist Mar 19 '14 at 23:24
Are there full platitudes? – Spehro Pefhany Mar 20 '14 at 23:49
And the adjectival form is "platitudinous". – Hugh Bothwell Mar 21 '14 at 3:35
Such a statement might be platitudinous, but a platitude is not necessarily a vacuous statement of the type the question describes. "There there, it will be OK" is a platitude, but it is not meaningless in the way asked about. – GreenAsJade Mar 21 '14 at 12:57

Inane, while the definition in simply silly/stupid Oxford Dictionary cites the origin as: mid 16th century: from Latin inanis 'empty, vain'

I think the connotation of vanity is important, for the statement is not just hollow, it may be self-servingly so.

share|improve this answer

If the statement is meaningless because it's obviously true in context, you can call it a tautology or tautological. If it's meaningless because it makes no sense in context, you can call it a non sequitur. Be careful with the spelling of the latter; it's commonly misspelled.

share|improve this answer
Yea I was thinking of tautology, from logic class where "x implies x" is called a tautology. – Celeritas Mar 20 '14 at 3:30
@Celeritas Tautology is used slightly differently in rhetoric and grammar than it is in logic, although all of them capture the general notion of stating (or repeating) something that is already known to be true, and therefore pointless. I linked to the Wikipedia disambiguation page, which then links to all of the various common uses of the word. – Bradd Szonye Mar 20 '14 at 4:31
A non-sequitur may make no sense, but this is not what is fundamental about it. A non-sequitur can make perfect sense, but just doesn't follow logically from the previous statement. Therefore I will go to bed now. – GreenAsJade Mar 21 '14 at 12:58
@GreenAsJade Agreed. In practice though, people don't generally bother to mention non sequiturs unless you're talking malarkey. – Bradd Szonye Mar 21 '14 at 18:28
I wonder if this is people using it who don't know what it means? "That's a bit of a non-sequitur, isn't it?" seems quite "normal" usage for someone who says something unrelated, to the flow of conversation, irrespective of twaddle. – GreenAsJade Mar 21 '14 at 23:32

Vapid, which is offering nothing that is stimulating or challenging.

share|improve this answer
Great suggestion! – GreenAsJade Mar 21 '14 at 12:59

Your question is pointless and worthless.

Your examples are nonsensical.

share|improve this answer

Twaddle has lately been my favorite term for statements like that.

It means exactly what you've asked for: Insignificant, trivial nonsense in speech or writing.

share|improve this answer

Hokum, flapdoodle, blatherskite

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/american_english/hokum Hokum is probably an alteration of hocus-pocus and bunkum source




The second part of his statement was the kind of populist hokum that carries as much intellectual weight as an X-Factor judge's comments: source

Philosophical flapdoodle and follies of ideation. source

What a load of blatherskite and balderdash. source

share|improve this answer

If you want to describe something that seems meaningless, rather than is meaningless, and thus be more polite about it, consider these words. They leave room, when you use them, to be understood that you are not quite to the point of claiming something is complete nonsense:

Incomprehensible: impossible to understand or comprehend; unintelligible.

Cryptic: mysterious in meaning; puzzling; ambiguous.

Perplexing: to cause to be puzzled or bewildered over what is not understood or certain.

And not quite so polite:
Inane: lacking sense, significance, or ideas.

share|improve this answer
Inane is a good one for this question, for sure. – GreenAsJade Mar 21 '14 at 12:59

I think my favourite is 'waffle' which is essentially people talking on and on running out the clock. Popular with politicians.

'Piffle' is what you might say to call something nonsense.

share|improve this answer

While perhaps not exactly pertinent to the sentences selected by the OP, mumbo jumbo does describe those instances where a combination of phrases, words, and expressions are practically meaningless to the lay person.

I am thinking of legalese, especially the itty bitty print that you see at the end of every contract you will ever sign in your lifetime. That very bit, which everyone tells you should read before signing, but when you do your eyes glaze over, your brain enters mist zone and in the end you realize you haven't understood a single bloody word. A worldwide phenomenon, English or Italian legal documents, it doesn't matter, they're all mumbo jumbo to me.

  • We were confused by all the legal mumbo jumbo.
  • His explanation was just a lot of mumbo jumbo.
  • It's all full of psychoanalytic mumbo jumbo.
share|improve this answer

I would suggest that you are looking for "drivel" as in meaningless noise:

drivel (ˈdrɪvəl) vb, -els, -elling or -elled, -els, -eling or -eled 1. to allow (saliva) to flow from the mouth; dribble 2. (intr) to speak foolishly or childishly n 3. foolish or senseless talk 4. (Physiology) saliva flowing from the mouth; slaver

From the Free Dictionary.

share|improve this answer

poppycock, balderdash, dribble, convolute

but the best is probably: trite

How can you listen to such poppycock? balderdash! Who wrote this dribble? Your answer is trite and meaningless.

share|improve this answer
If you were to give examples, or explain why your suggestions fit, it would help the OP. – Mari-Lou A Mar 19 '14 at 21:11

A few words come to mind: insipid, jejune, or uninspired

share|improve this answer

Non sequitur - a statement that is not connected in a logical or clear way to anything said before it


share|improve this answer

Yogi-isms. From Yogi Berra who uttered profound, yet inexplicable statements.


share|improve this answer

I've heard this described as "argle bargle" particularly when it's angry or impassioned meaningless nonsense.

share|improve this answer




"Scarcity has neither a fleck, nor is it a community. Discuss."

share|improve this answer

I am not exactly sure this is what you were looking for, but the first statement is not even wrong.

This states:

Not even wrong refers to any statement, argument or explanation that can be neither correct nor incorrect, because it fails to meet the criteria by which correctness and incorrectness are determined. As a more formal fallacy, it refers to the fine art of generating an ostensibly "correct" conclusion, but from premises known to be wrong or inapplicable.

share|improve this answer
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post - you can always comment on your own posts, and once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post. – David M Mar 20 '14 at 23:54
@DavidM please check out that link: it looks like JMU doesn't try to tell the OP that the first statement is actually correct, but the link provided shows a fallacy about certain statements, and is therefore an actual answer. Problem is clearly that the answer isn't provided but only linked, I'll propose an edit – Nanne Mar 21 '14 at 7:44
If this is a correct answer is of course a different thing :) – Nanne Mar 21 '14 at 7:46
@Nanne That is a better post. Link-only answers get tagged as low-quality and are usually tagged as not an answer on some level. I had meant to click the link-only version of those canned responses and accidentally tagged the one I did. Thanks for improving this answer. – David M Mar 21 '14 at 11:03

I like the neologism "deepity" for that kind of profound, yet meaningless truisms.

share|improve this answer

The correct term is "bromide" which means a commonplace or hackneyed statement or notion. The sentence in question is a malicious piece of political propaganda and was crafted to cast opprobrium on those who do not agree with the underlying thesis.

share|improve this answer

"stating the obvious" where it is just generally not necessary or redundant where it is specifically repetitive

share|improve this answer

protected by RegDwigнt Mar 21 '14 at 14:47

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.