In my part of the world, we refer to highways without any article. So we drive on "Highway 64", or "Interstate 64", or "I-64". But when I go to California, they say "The 101". Is there any explanation for this difference?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
It's a regional variation. In California, where I grew up, it was "take the 101 north", "get on the 405", and so on. In Pennsylvania, where I now live, it's "take 202 north", "get on I-95", and so forth. Note that this only applies to numbered roads, really -- in both places, named roads get the article: "the Schuylkill", "the Hollywood freeway", "the Blue Route", "the Pacific Coast highway".
I don't know where the dividing line is for the different usages, nor do I know what they do in other English-speaking countries.
My husband reports that local usage in Indiana (where he lived for a time) does not use the definite article on numbered roads. Friends who lived in Florida report the same thing.
According to Wikipedia, this name for U.S. Route 101 is localized in southern California. Apparently this way of naming highways is a common phenomenon in Los Angeles. More common in the States are affectionate nicknames for highways without using their route numbers. Some examples from the Boston, Massachusetts area are, The Pike and The Artery (pronounced Ah-taree).
It's called "the 101" because that's short for "the 101 Freeway", which is its real name.
Here's how the L.A. Times refers to it:
By the way, the 101 is also called the Pacific Highway in some parts of California.
As far as I know, this is a usage fairly local to LA. (The other freeways get the same treatment: "the 405", for instance.)
protected by RegDwigнt♦ Mar 11 '14 at 3:15
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?