English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Therefore, classic ontology denies any full reality to change, which is conceived as only accidental and not essential

In the above sentence, which is the object(or complement) of the 'deny'? what is the 'to change' to modify? what is the 'which' substitutes?

share|improve this question
For more context, take a look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_philosophy – Dusty Mar 9 '11 at 17:08
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The object of deny is any full reality. The word change is being used as a noun, and is the object of the preposition to, which indicates whose claim is being denied. (Note that this in not an instance of the infinitive to change.) So this:

Classical ontology denies any full reality to change.

Basically means:

Classical ontology denies that change is fully real.

The antecedent of the relative pronoun which is the noun change. So the second half of the quoted sentence means:

Change is conceived as only accidental and not essential.

share|improve this answer
+1 This is how I like my explanations. – Cerberus Mar 10 '11 at 0:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.