English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can "hew to" and "conform with/to" be used just about interchangeably for whatever register of AE, including the most formal prose?

...shall hew to the law and the recognized standards of legal construction.source

Rather than hew to the rules...source

share|improve this question
Very uncommon usage to those who are not used to reading legal briefs! But, from context, I would say yes. Not sure if there is a formal legal distinction, though. – David M Mar 3 '14 at 0:05
'hew to' is not that common and is a bit more grandiose sounding. So it is not 'interchangeable', they may have identical semantic denotations, but their contexts distinguish them. – Mitch Mar 3 '14 at 13:50
I'm experiencing blue car syndrome and I'm seeing hew to being used all over the place. But, I'd still call it less common. – David M Mar 11 '14 at 0:42
@DavidM nice to know that. What about "would you mind and...", "Would you be so kind and...", and "Would you be kind enough and...", have you lately caught any of these constructions over the place? – Elian Mar 11 '14 at 1:15
@NourishedGourmet Not even a little. – David M Mar 11 '14 at 3:09
up vote 4 down vote accepted

As hew is defined as conform, adhere, I'd say yes. And like many words in legalese, hew is a very old (1200s) word.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.