Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

“Because of the graphic nature of this footage, viewer discretion is advised”, to me, is correct grammar with “because of”.

But you'll often see it written and used on TV as: “Due to the graphic nature of this footage, viewer discretion is advised.

I thought due to was used only to mean attributable to, as in:The bad weather was due to [attributable to] the icy roads.

In the sentence below,

Because of the graphic nature of this footage, viewer discretion is advised,

we need because of. We wouldn't say Due to [Attributable to] the graphic nature of this footage, viewer discretion is advised.

Is because of the truly correct grammatical choice in that sentence?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by FumbleFingers, choster, aedia λ, Edwin Ashworth, Matt Эллен Feb 26 at 16:41

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
I think they are both fine. Merriam-Webster online even defines "due to" as "because of". –  Stan Feb 25 at 17:16

1 Answer 1

My dictionary (the Dictionary app in OS X 10.6) has "because of" as definition #2 for "due to". It has a usage note that says that traditional grammarians oppose this use, for the reason you give, but it has become widespread and can be regarded as standard English now.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.