Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know the phrase means "going all out" but I can't figure out what it literally means or where it originates from.

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Wiktionary sez:

First attested in the 1960s in the context of aviation. Probably coined by pilots whose throttle levers had round, ball-like tops and for whom putting the "balls to the wall" (the firewall of the aircraft) meant making the aircraft fly as quickly as possible.

share|improve this answer
1  
That would only be one ball, not two. Just sayin'. –  Oldcat Feb 20 at 18:13
5  
This aircraft begs to differ: maam.org/airshow/r4d_cockpit.htm –  WinnieNicklaus Feb 20 at 18:22
3  
Actually, the balls are in a fairly neutral position in the main photo, and they are pushed toward the firewall in the control quadrant close-up. But the reason for the photo is to show you that planes can have two throttle levers. –  WinnieNicklaus Feb 20 at 18:48
2  
While this may be true, I have a hard time believing that the phrase does not refer to testicles. This etymology sounds sanitized. –  Bradd Szonye Feb 20 at 22:42
1  
It doesn't have to be one or the other -- while the literal interpretation of the phrase would refer to the throttle levers and firewall, giving a coherent meaning to the phrase, it's entirely possible that it only caught on because of the double entendre. –  WinnieNicklaus Feb 20 at 22:47
show 2 more comments

If one's testicles are against a wall surely one cannot push them any further? Doesn't that mean you're at the limit?

share|improve this answer
add comment

I think it comes from racing or aircraft when you have the engine going as fast as possible and your whole body is pressed back against the seat and wall of the cockpit...including the 'balls'.

share|improve this answer
3  
I'll vote for that. Despite any semblance of proof, I want to believe that this is the correct origin. –  David M Feb 20 at 18:09
add comment

protected by tchrist Mar 31 at 22:50

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.