English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can someone please explain the meaning of the quotation

"We don't see things as they are – we see them as we are."?

share|improve this question
Welcome to EL&U. – Eli Feb 18 '14 at 22:10
It's grammatically garbage, phrased that way purely for the snappy wordplay (which wouldn't be "snappy" if it was more properly expressed as something like "we see them according to what we are"). – FumbleFingers Feb 19 '14 at 0:35

I believe this is related to the idea that each person who sees a thing will see it filtered through their own perceptions. So none of us really see it objectively. Each person sees it with their own beliefs, preconceptions, interpretation, and attitude.

For example, the Rorschach test is (or used to be, don't know if it still is) used to analyse a person's personality, psychological and emotional characteristics. What a person sees in the ink blots isn't about the ink blots, it's about their perception of the ink blots, and hence about them.

share|improve this answer
Hence all answers to 'What does X mean?' stand to be subjective. As a friend says, "All words are infinitely polysemous." – Edwin Ashworth Feb 18 '14 at 22:46
@Edwin especially "polysemous". – andy256 Feb 18 '14 at 23:21
Yes, because of the way our brains actually work. Each of us integrates our present perceptions with our past experiences and future expectations using a uniquely individualized interpretive glue. The Rorschach test was considered a good measure of the integrated thought process because the inkblots had no intrinsic meaning per se. – ScotM Jun 20 '15 at 0:45

It means that the way we see things reflects who we are. One example is how we see a problem. If we see the problem as a burden, our perception tells us that we are a negative person. If we see the problem as a way to improve ourselves, that perception tells us that we are a positive person.

share|improve this answer

Everyone acts in one's own interest, french speakers would say "everyone sees the sun at his door". objectivity versus subjectivity is a false debate. The solution is in the great art of thinking with somebody else's head, that is intersubjectivity, where is the only sole sun.

share|improve this answer

Attitudes are much more important than facts.

Karl A. Menninger, a US psychiatrist wrote that, and for me ist expresses the same (or 'Einstellungen sind wichtiger als Tatsachen', in my mother language)

share|improve this answer

protected by Rathony Mar 5 at 4:51

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.