English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Are these words synonyms?

zugzwang — a situation where one player is put at a disadvantage because he has to make a move when he would prefer to pass and make no move

catch-22 — a logical paradox arising from a situation in which an individual needs something that can only be acquired by not being in that very situation

catch-33 — the fifth full-length studio album by Swedish metal band Meshuggah

share|improve this question

No. Zugzwang is a chess term (as I suspect you may already know) meaning a state in the game when a player can't make a move without ruining his position: no alternative is acceptable.

You know what Catch-22 means, as you demonstrate in your previous question. And you asked about Catch-33 there as well. Maybe you should wait until you are satisfied with an answer there and then compare those ideas to the chess term.

share|improve this answer
I am already satisfied by the answers there. Really, I always used the word zugzwang though I found that Americans use flavors of catch-??. This is metaphor and in life making no move is also a move leading to worsening of situation. – Gennady Vanin Геннадий Ванин Mar 5 '11 at 18:07
@vgv8: In that case maybe you should accept one so people will have a better idea what you were actually asking. – Robusto Mar 5 '11 at 18:14
"Catch-22" is the title of a book by Joseph Heller. It's the origin of the term. "Catch-33" would have to be a neologism. – The Raven Mar 5 '11 at 18:45
@The Raven: Yes, of course. See the OP's other question regarding Catch-22. The book gave meaning to the term, but the term now has a meaning independent of the book. – Robusto Mar 5 '11 at 18:54
seems I've goofed in my writing. I understood explanations but I'm in doubt. I have never used 22 but always used 33 (I even cannot recall why) though with quite different meaning and connotation associated while internet search results hint for 4th and 5th meanings – Gennady Vanin Геннадий Ванин Mar 6 '11 at 5:27

catch-22 is not a synonymous to zugzwang. The first one means a dilemma, or a situation from which there is no escape. Zugzwang, while it also pertains to difficult situations, is about being in a tight spot because of a specific rule of chess: you have to make a move at your turn.

PS: I don't know about catch-33, but I am sure to be enlightened by the answers to your other question dealing with it.

share|improve this answer
I also did not know about catch-33. I was written it in correspondence to me – Gennady Vanin Геннадий Ванин Mar 5 '11 at 17:54

Zugzwang, although it is usually defined otherwise, means that you are already losing and it will become obvious after your next move.

Catch-22 is about the paradoxes of military life, in particular the impossibility of benefiting from a provision to protect the insane described in the book, and is used for other cases in life where the preconditions for something make it impossible to obtain.

Catch-33 is simply a play on Catch-22 and means whatever its user wants it to mean; in Meshuggah's case it allowed them to nod towards Heller's book in their album title without attempting to cover it.

share|improve this answer
This is not what zugzwang means, either in chess or metaphorically. In chess, it means a position where the player who has the move loses, and where this would not be the case if his opponent moved next. In other words, the fact that he has to move makes him lose. – Peter Shor Mar 6 '11 at 18:43
@Peter Shor: as I said, it is formally defined otherwise. But with good chess players, one is in zugzwang because the other has planned to get to a winning (or in some cases drawing) position and has realised the consequences of the particular position earlier. – Henry Mar 6 '11 at 20:13
point taken. However, you completely lose the metaphorical meaning if you use this definition. – Peter Shor Mar 7 '11 at 16:51

While zugzwang is predominantly a chess term, it is also occasionally used metaphorically for real-life situations where whoever makes the next move is left at a disadvantage. This doesn't mean quite the same thing as a Catch-22, although it's similar.

share|improve this answer

Yes! Well, sort of. Zugzwang is reasonably synonymous with Catch-22: Both refer to having a dilemma that will not improve, no matter which choice you make. The only difference is that zugzwang implies that you will be in a weaker position after you make a choice. Whereas Catch-22 just implies that whatever you try to change, it will not improve your situation (i.e. it will not necessarily make it worse).

Catch-33 doesn't mean anything. It's just the name of an album.

share|improve this answer
Sorta like the difference between the first and second laws of thermodynamics? – T.E.D. Nov 2 '11 at 13:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.