English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it correct to invert the subordinate sentence in English? For instance:

When the time comes, so shall we reign the land!

If it is correct, what is the rule? Or is it only in old English?

share|improve this question
I am confused about what you are referring to. Are you talking about the inverted verb-subject order in the second clause? – Kosmonaut Mar 5 '11 at 15:34
yes, the inverted verb-subject order. – sterz Mar 6 '11 at 4:54
But here the first clause is subordinate. The inverted one is the main clause. – Jason Orendorff Apr 15 '11 at 18:06
up vote 4 down vote accepted

That is an archaic construction (and not limited to subordinate clauses/sentences); one wouldn't use it today except in dialog in a period piece.

share|improve this answer
Is something wicked this way comes also archaic? – sterz Mar 5 '11 at 6:57
Yes -- it's a quotation from Shakespeare's Macbeth (Act IV, Scene I). – bye Mar 5 '11 at 7:07
"I like cinema." "So do I." – kiamlaluno Mar 5 '11 at 15:41
Also archaic, I'm afraid. (Even that meaning of the word so only holds in certain specific phrases.) Old forms hold on in frequently-used words and phrases even as the world changes around them. There are a few individual idiomatic phrases you just have to know -- like so do I and how to pluralize ox. There is no general rule of grammar to apply. – bye Mar 5 '11 at 23:14
That meaning of so works in a surprising variety of places; see this question. But it is definitely grammatically unique. – Jason Orendorff Apr 15 '11 at 17:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.