English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a difference in meaning of the following sentences?

  1. It will take two years to build a bridge on this river.

  2. It would take two years to build a bridge on this river.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Centaurus, ScotM, Ellie Kesselman, choster, Tushar Raj May 19 '15 at 19:53

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

will implies it has yet to happen and definitive

and would implies it has yet to happen but not definitive

share|improve this answer

Yes, though only a subtle one regarding likelihood.

Will, as a future tense, carries with it a bit of certainty. In your first sentence, the bridge is expected to be built and will take two years.

Would, as the past tense of will or as a conditional, indicates a possible or imagined situation. In your second sentence, the bridge could be built, and if it is, it will take two years.

share|improve this answer
In addition, would can add the condition that something necessary is missing for it to succeed. "If we had the steel, it would take 2 years to build a bridge." – David M Feb 13 '14 at 7:55

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.