English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to shorten a sentence which is somewhat structured as follows:

{something} turned out to be {something}

Is there a single word that could replace turned out to be?


I thought the food was real, but it turned out to be plastic.

share|improve this question
up vote 14 down vote accepted

Answering the general question, the word is proved. In fact one definition for prove over at both Wiktionary and Merriam-Webster is literally "to turn out to be". Quoting the former,

3. (copulative) To turn out to be.
Have an exit strategy should your calculations prove incorrect.

In your specific example sentence, however, I'd prefer actually saying "turned out to be". Otherwise the register seems off.

share|improve this answer
"proved to be" is another option, which sounds more natural to my ears than trying to use just "proved" in the example sentence (but isn't just one word) – Tim S. Feb 12 '14 at 20:50

'was' fits in the sentence you give. "Turned out to be" implies a change that never actually happened.

I thought the food was real, but it was plastic.

share|improve this answer
Upvoting because it does fit in the sentence. Not sure I agree about the implied change though. Even if such a change is a physically possibility (as in "I thought the lake was frozen, but it turned out it wasn't") that still doesn't mean the change occurred between first seeing it and actually testing. – Mr Lister Feb 13 '14 at 13:33
Yes, there's nothing wrong with 'turned out to be' as a figure of speech. But the only thing that would make 'was' inapplicable would be if there had been some such change – Oldcat Feb 13 '14 at 17:38

I thought the food was real, but discovered it was plastic.

Not exactly a match for "turned out to be" since "discovered" is about you and not the food, but for this sentence it seems to work as needed.

share|improve this answer

I thought the food would be real, but actually it was plastic.

I expected the movie to be garbage; actually, it was quite good.

Not an exact substitute for "turns out to..." but it could be used in many of the same contexts.

share|improve this answer

Depending on the demands of turned out to be ( i.e. if it is scientific where you need to imply that it could have become something else ) you can use a comma, then subsequently, and rest on the next implication more than the became. Knowing the existing sentence would help, otherwise.

Update: Or, if you want to go the ironic route: alas. Also with a comma before it. This adds the quality of having an attitude or air of a sort, also. If another word is possible, then: , but alas.

share|improve this answer
How about in the case: "I thought the food was real, but it turned out to be plastic." – Chong Waldo Feb 12 '14 at 17:00
@ChongWaldo I updated my answer with what immediately came to me when you gave me a sentence. – digitalextremist Feb 12 '14 at 17:03
'Alas' hardly means 'but it turned / turns out to be'. It's just that the words can sometimes (one thinks of Dumbledore) be sensibly elided. 'No – ...' would sometimes work, too. – Edwin Ashworth Feb 12 '14 at 17:34

'Transpired' might fit the bill, but it requires a slightly different structure.

(of a secret or something unknown) come to be known; be revealed:

I thought the food was real, but it transpired it was plastic.

share|improve this answer

Eventuate seems closest to the meaning "turned out to be", as in

His ideas seemed promising, but they eventuated a disappointment.

share|improve this answer


His ideas seemed promising, but they ended up disappointing.

His ideas seemed promising, but they became disappointing.

His ideas seemed promising but they yielded disappointment.

share|improve this answer

After a career of publically displayed integrity, it emerged that the politician was a crook.

share|improve this answer

protected by tchrist Mar 1 '15 at 19:31

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.