English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Take for example the two sentences "Ria was blind" and "Yet she became a lawyer." When we join these 2 sentences using a subordinating conjunction, which is correct and why?

"In spite of Ria being blind, she became a lawyer."


"In spite of being blind, Ria became a lawyer."

share|improve this question
Not sure why though, but #1 seems to be wrong. Not sure how to explain it though, but I am very sure of it. – JFW Mar 4 '11 at 15:39
Probably has something to do with introduction of names. You wouldn't introduce Ria as a new name if it hadn't been mentioned prior unless you used the second sentence. – Neil Mar 4 '11 at 15:44
JFW thanks. I too felt the second option was correct.Butt I wanted to know the reason..just in case a student asked me.. – GPEnglish Mar 4 '11 at 16:03
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Both are possible. I agree that the second is more natural, but I would not be surprised to find the first as the opening sentence of a piece of writing, particularly fiction. To me it has a presentational quality, and is foregrounding her blindness.

share|improve this answer

In the first sentence, it seems that the subject of the first clause is different from the subject of the second clause. I would use it in a context where it is clear the subject of the sentence is only one.
Apart that, both the sentences have the same meaning.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.