Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The word "pet" has a few different definitions (my own paraphrase):

  • n: An animal kept for companionship.
  • v: To affectionately caress.

My question is, which of these usages originated first? Do we refer to companion animals as "pets" because we pet them? Or is the act of "petting" so dubbed because it is what we do to pets?

share|improve this question
    
In Australia we keep pets, but we don't pet them.. We pat them. There is no such thing as petting. –  user5797 Mar 7 '11 at 16:30

1 Answer 1

Etymonline to the rescue:

"tamed animal," originally in Scottish and northern England dialect (and exclusively so until mid-18c.), of unknown origin. Sense of "indulged child" (c.1500) is recorded slightly earlier than that of "animal kept as a favorite" (1530s), but the latter may be the primary meaning. [...] The verb is 1620s meaning "treat as a pet;" the sense of "to stroke" is first found 1818.

So the noun came first.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.