English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a word or idiom describing a situation where a rebuttal to an argument is evidence to it (especially when it is ironic/meta)?

A very simple example:

John: “You can talk!”

Mary: “No I can't!”

John put forth an argument, and Mary rebutted it; in doing so, she inadvertently gave evidence to the contrary.

share|improve this question
Related: youtube.com/watch?v=jVygqjyS4CA [Python] – Orbling Mar 4 '11 at 0:16
My favorite as a child was "Are you asleep?" "Yes." – Marthaª Mar 4 '11 at 0:54
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The word is self-refuting (or self-defeating).

In his Introduction to Logic, Harry Gensler defines a self-refuting statement as “[A] statement that makes negative claims so sweeping that it ends up denying itself.”

For instance, Truth does not exist (Is that a true statement?); Nothing is absolute (Is that absolutely true?); "I cannot speak a word of English”

There is a difference between self-contradiction and self-refutation.

Are you asleep? yes (self-refutation).

I am sleeping and not sleeping. (self contradiction)

share|improve this answer

This situation is best described as a catch-22, or a logical paradox which can be escaped only by denying its premise. The eponymous novel by Joseph Heller, Catch-22, contains the following illustration:

  1. One must seek a declaration of insanity to be exempt from combat duty.

  2. Those who go into combat duty are insane.

Therefore, to seek exemption from combat duty is tacit proof of one's own sanity. Under these circumstances, no declaration of insanity can ever be granted, but there is no recourse but to seek one.

The situation you set up between John and Mary is not exactly the same, because in reality Mary has a valid rebuttal available to her. She could respond with silence, and thereby disprove John's statement. Assuming you had constrained the situation so that only verbal rebuttals were acceptable, however, then I believe the word/idiom you're looking for is catch-22.

share|improve this answer
I'm aware of catch-22s and I certainly considered it, but the actual word I'm looking for doesn't describe a paradox. Another better example might be, “You're an angry person” responded to with, “No I’m not, I’m just mad all the time.” – coreyward Mar 4 '11 at 1:31
Oh, okay. I had a feeling you might have considered it, but I figured I'd take a shot anyway. I'll keep pondering. Hope you get some bites! – leetishmel Mar 4 '11 at 1:39

You may be thinking of paralepsis or aphophasis -- 'mentioning by not mentioning'.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.