English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Which one sentence is correct: "For those who know" or "For those who knows"? Google gives me about the same number (1 070 000 vs 783 000) of search results.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by FumbleFingers, choster, aedia λ, tchrist, Rory Alsop Feb 4 '14 at 10:22

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. A list of these references can be found here: List of general references" – FumbleFingers, choster, aedia λ, tchrist, Rory Alsop
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The verb tense issue is General Reference. But those who don't know how misleading Google "guestimated results" can be should consider the fact that whereas I too get just over 1M hits claimed for "for those who know", I actually get over five times as many for "for those who know how". Don't believe everything on the Internet (especially Google! :) – FumbleFingers Feb 3 '14 at 4:23
I really wish there were a way to get Google not to help by modifying search phrases to what is correct. But my understanding is that they actually are more efficient (from a computational perspective) if they don't waste cycles searching for wrong things, so they choose to correct by default and not give the user the ability not to correct. – jbeldock Feb 3 '14 at 4:40
up vote 4 down vote accepted

"For those who know" is the correct form, matching plural form of verb to plural form of subject.

"For those who knows" is a cute rhyme, and its meaning (same as the correct form) is still immediately evident.

share|improve this answer
Thanks a lot! Now everything is clear! – ezpresso Feb 3 '14 at 1:20

Google numbers are notoriously unreliable, to the extent of not meaning anything at all. For starters, different people get different numbers, and indeed the same person will get different numbers depending on the computer, browser or OS they are using.

In this browser right now, I get 8.6 million results for "for those who know" but only 667k for "for those who knows". That's already quite a different picture from the one that has been painted to you. And when I click through to page 30, that number drops down to just 328. That's a well-known workaround for a well-documented problem.

8550000 results vs. 328 is a whole nother story, isn't it? Though of course the 8550000 number is a lie, too. In fact Google does not serve more than 1000 hits for any query, they have an error message specifically saying just that.

Anyway, you shouldn't be using Google in the first place, but rather a professional corpus, such as the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) or the British National Corpus (BNC):

                      COCA    BNC

for those who knows      0      0     
for those who know      47     11 

Needless to say, it is immediately clear to any native speaker why that would be. Those is plural, so the verb should be plural as well.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.