English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can I say:

The assets suffer from a lack of reliability.

Is suffer an admissible word in this context?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Suffer and lack can most certainly be used together. Thus, your example is correct:

The assets suffer from a lack of reliability.

Suffer goes well directly with negative nouns; some common phrases (mostly literary) are:

suffer loss • suffer want • suffer defeat • suffer depression • suffer pain • suffer shame • suffer neglect

share|improve this answer
another example: "I suffer fools gladly, and there is no lack of them." – Hexagon Tiling Feb 11 '12 at 10:11

Yes, it's fine. "Suffer" and "lack" work well together; a lack of something is possibly the most common cause of suffering.

share|improve this answer

The reason you ask this is probably that you perceive some slight overlap in meaning, which usually indicates bad style, as do most pleonasms. To suffer = to go through something negative (as in "I can tell she is suffering"); a lack = the negative situation in which there is something you do not have. And yet this collocation is fine.

As the others have noted, the verb to suffer happens to have many cast-iron idioms that contain other negative words as well. Perhaps you may feel somewhat relieved if you consider the origin of the word. It comes from Latin suffero, which means "to undergo, to bear" (its elements are sub "under" and fero "carry, bear"). "To undergo something negative" has much less of this overlap.

I believe the English verb was used with the sense "to undergo" more frequently in the past than it is now; that is probably why it sometimes feels a bit unusual in some idioms if you are not familiar with them. But any decent dictionary will still give you the sense "to undergo", even though it is now somewhat less common.

share|improve this answer
Good answer. Thanks. – John Assymptoth Mar 4 '11 at 10:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.