Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The phrase "sleeping with someone" often means "having sex." What is the origin of this sexual connotation? Is there a non-sexual equivalent of this phrase to express sleeping with someone without sexual intercourse?

share|improve this question
16  
"I am going to sleep at their place." How about "spending the night"? –  Lester Nubla Jan 28 at 5:43
48  
Well... If you're going to share a bed, even if you clearly specify that you won't "do" anything, sex will always be the implication to others. –  Lester Nubla Jan 28 at 5:47
59  
@Kris A dirty mind is a joy forever –  mplungjan Jan 28 at 6:44
19  
@LesterNubla I would say "spending the night" is suggestive as well. I guess these phrases are so often used euphemistically we just jump to those conclusions?! –  starsplusplus Jan 28 at 10:50
11  
" why would you do that?" Because you're both tired and there's only one bed, or there's no heat and not enough bedding. Because you're a couple who co-own the bed (yes, that's right, couples don't constantly have sex.) I'm sure an intelligent person with a decent imagination can come up with other reasons. –  Jim Balter Jan 28 at 20:52

37 Answers 37

up vote 207 down vote accepted

Well with babies we often say 'to sleep(/be) in the bed with'. As in "our baby sleeps in the bed with us."

This extends to adults. Warning... NOTE the use of THE, 'in the bed' is different than 'in bed'!!! Compare 'I was in bed with him' and 'I was in the bed with him'.

Would any of the following examples imply sex....?

  • I slept in the bed with him.

  • I stayed the whole night in the bed with her.

  • They were in the bed together.

It works because 'the bed' is geographical, but 'bed' has many nuances...

share|improve this answer
76  
Yes, yes, and yes. (USA) The only reason it doesn't have a sexual connotation with kids is because...well...they're kids. That assumption of innocence typically does not extend to adults. –  cHao Jan 28 at 9:40
22  
@Chao, I can only speak for myself but they don't imply sex. "i was in the bed the whole night with him' almost underlines no sex. –  Gamemorize Jan 28 at 10:30
6  
I must add "to bed someone" means to have sex with someone. The speaker must emphasize the 'the'; otherwise, it can easily be missed. –  Anonymous Jan 28 at 19:28
4  
@MichaelHampton Well, there is YouTube footage that suggests differently, but I admit I haven't tried it. I'm too busy being in the bed, sleeping alongside, but not with various people. –  KitFox Jan 29 at 2:47
11  
(USA) This should not be the accepted answer because it doesn't apply to non-native speakers and is ambiguous in writing. Yes, if an American said to me "I slept in the bed with her" without indicating euphemism (wink, tongue-in-cheek), I would probably interpret it as saying that no intercourse took place, but if I read it or if someone said it with an accent, I would probably think they meant to say "sleep with" but didn't know the difference. –  David Schwartz Jan 29 at 19:55

You can use "crash with someone".

Example:

I had no place to stay so I crashed with her.

Although not foolproof, it implies less the act of having sex.

Edit: As it's been pointed out, crashing with someone implies some sort of need. You might be too tired to go elsewhere or not have anywhere else to stay.

Edit 2: Some variants I can think of are "crashing at someone's place" or "crashing on someone's couch". If you just use "crash with someone" you avoid telling exactly where you slept.

share|improve this answer
6  
I've used this phrase in those situations as well. 'Bunking' definitely does have some sexual connotations that 'crash' does not (yet) have –  Spork Jan 28 at 10:05
10  
"Crash with" is good, not least because it implies you were too tired to do anything else! ;) –  starsplusplus Jan 28 at 10:51
1  
What's nice about crashing, too, is that it's not even necessarily on the same bed. (I might crash on the sofa at her place.) –  J.R. Jan 28 at 11:20
28  
I would crash AT her place, not crash WITH her, which sounds like your both were coming down from a drug-induced high –  mplungjan Jan 28 at 12:55
10  
To me, "crash" implies that I slept on someone's couch. –  Bruce James Jan 28 at 13:57

Unfortunately, the act of sleeping in the same bed as someone is often taken to imply sex in English, at least in the States. I sometimes say "sleep next to" someone because it sounds more innocent, but even then it is mistaken to mean that more happened than sleep.

There are several good suggestions, but I haven't found a 100% fool proof way to say "slept together without having sex".

Here is a better explanation from the comments-

Consider these three fictitious scenarios: "My aunt was admitted to the hospital, so my mother and I drove to visit her. The only hotel in town only had one queen sized bed available, so my mother and I __." Scenario 2, which is an example of a non-inocuous use of "sleeping together", goes like this: "I met a woman at a conference, and we really hit it off. I took her out to dinner, we kissed in the park, and that night, we __." Scenario 3 goes like this, "My best friend and I went to a dance event in another state. Hotels were expensive, so she and I __." I haven't found a phrase that fits comfortably into 1 and 3, without fitting into 2.

So without a bit of setup, there isn't a single phrase that describes what you're looking for.

share|improve this answer
5  
Yes I agree with you. Except if you sleep together with your mother. :P –  Lester Nubla Jan 28 at 5:51
6  
@LesterNubla Well, that's the power of context. –  Avner Shahar-Kashtan Jan 28 at 5:53
7  
Casually it's often expressed like this: "We slept together but we didn't sleep together" (spoken English). Which means that you shared a bed but no sexual activity was involved. –  starsplusplus Jan 28 at 10:58
3  
I upvoted this for "slept next to" because it was close to what I'd have answered "Slept in the same bed" but NOT "shared a bed". –  TecBrat Jan 28 at 11:49
1  
@Spook Consider these three fictitious scenarios: "My aunt was admitted to the hospital, so my mother and I drove to visit her. The only hotel in town only had one queen sized bed, so she and I ______." Scenario 2, which is an example of a non-inocuous use of "sleeping together", goes like this: "I met a woman at a conference, and we really hit it off. I took her out to dinner, we kissed in the park, and that night, we ______." Scenario 3 goes like this, "My best friend and I went to a dance event in another state. Hotels were expensive, so she and I ______." You want something that fits(con't –  JFA Jan 28 at 20:50

The phrases below are often used when small children sleep with their parents in the same bed.

To share the bed together (or) share the same bed
To sleep in the same bed

If you lack a spare room, and a guest needs to spend the night, you might offer to share your bed with him or her. This is often the case between close friends and relatives. I have shared the same bed with a cousin, who is more like a sister to me, and with an elderly aunt who felt scared to be alone in a strange house.

I wouldn't say to an acquaintance, "I slept with my cousin last night" that might be misconstrued as meaning we had sexual intercourse. On the other hand, "We shared the same bed" and "My cousin and I slept in the same bed" do not strike me as being sexual in the least.

share|improve this answer
3  
While I think the connotation is less strong for "sharing a bed" than "sleeping together," I think if somebody said "they're sharing a bed these days" I would take it to mean that a sexual relationship had progressed. –  Bradd Szonye Jan 28 at 22:13
2  
@BraddSzonye everything depends on context. One night, in an emergency, you share the same bed with a friend - no big deal. After one week, I'd say something more than sleep is happening. :) –  Mari-Lou A Jan 28 at 22:24
3  
I think “sleep in the same bed” has less potential for unwanted euphemism than “share a bed” does. –  Bradd Szonye Jan 28 at 23:18

Best option is to not mention the word "bed" at all -- use "stayed at" or "crashed at" and include the word "overnight" if clarification is needed.

share|improve this answer
1  
But if I stayed at someone's place overnight, it doesn't necessarily mean we slept in the same bed. It could be I slept in the spare room, on the sofa, on the floor... –  Mari-Lou A Jan 28 at 17:58
3  
It doesn't even imply sleep, really. Maybe two co-workers had a very productive all-nighter together. –  user1306322 Jan 28 at 18:43

The only way to do this is to be explicit. Yes, you can phrase it to reduce the connotation but you cannot eliminate it. The only exception is where societal context would strongly suggest you weren't having sex - i.e. "It was horrible, I had to share the bed with my mum" or "they're the kind of hippy household where the baby sleeps with them".

If you want to talk about sleeping in the same bed but not having sex you need to spell it out, e.g. "She only has a bedsit so we shared the bed; nothing funny happened though".

share|improve this answer
6  
Being explicit to avoid sounding explicit. –  anthony-arnold Jan 30 at 12:30

If you had meant either

  1. … spending the night as a guest at another's home
    or
  2. (being a)n overnight guest

then you could use the word sleepover.

share|improve this answer
25  
Imagine a nice girl telling her mom ... Mom, my boyfriend is having a sleepover in my room. Mom says, Have fun! –  Blessed Geek Jan 28 at 7:07
4  
The power (mischief?) of imagination, not language, then. ;) –  Kris Jan 28 at 7:09
4  
Certainly this is how my 3 year old would describe it! –  Unsliced Jan 29 at 7:47

To answer the origin question: I'd presume it's simply because, in our relatively affluent American society, it's uncommon for folks above the age of puberty to share a bed with anyone they aren't romantically involved with. The main exception I can think of is when sharing a hotel room for economy's sake. So the phrase is rarely needed, hence rarely used, except as a euphemism... and the latter becomes a possible meaning unless there's some reason to believe otherwise. Whether it's the assumed meaning or not depends on knowing more about the individuals.

The only reliable workarounds are to be either more vague, or more explicit, about the arrangements. "I shared a hotel room with him", because it doesn't focus specifically on the sleeping arrangements, mostly avoids raising the question. Likewise the suggested formulations of "I stayed over" (a bit safer than "I stayed the night", for no very good reason), "I crashed at Karen's place", "He lent me his guest room", and so on. Obviously any of those could have involved sex before, during, or after, but they either avoid focusing on bed arrangements or suggest separate beds. And they avoid the specific formulation "sleep with" which is most strongly associated with sexual activity.

share|improve this answer

The answer by @Rhetorician failed to include the actual verb

To bunk: To stay the night; sleep: bunk over at a friend's house.

which does not exactly meet the requirements of sleeping in the same bed, but if you tell me you are going to bunk over at X's place and I know for a fact that he/she only has one bed, the picture coming to mind is you either sleeping next to that person or on the floor/couch

share|improve this answer
1  
@Bruce If we bunk together, we could be sharing a bed, or a set of bunk beds. Oh! That would be fun! We could make a fort on the lower bunk, and stay up all night reading comics with a flashlight! –  KitFox Jan 29 at 2:34
1  
I'll be in my bunk. –  SQB Jan 29 at 7:46
1  
I've lived in various states throughout the USA, and I know that "bunking with" a member of the opposite sex is synonymous with "sleeping with" or "shacking up with" that person. Perhaps there is a cultural difference I'm not aware of? I know "bunking" is a more common word in the UK. It does have the advantage of having zero sexual connotation when referring to a friend (of the same sex) or family member: "bunking with my cousin" is entirely different from "sleeping with my cousin." But then again, "staying over" works the same way. –  David Schwartz Jan 29 at 21:08

Joys of going to an all-boy boarding school, field trips, etc. where hormonal kids were occasionally required to share beds at overnight sporting events, etc. The phrase we used then was very effective, and has not been mentioned in this question. I think it is ideal to express 'sharing a bed with no sexual activity'. In the context of a school boys having to tell their story to their parents about a hotel stay where they had to share a bed: "Hey Mom, James and I had to split a bed last night".

  • Jenny and I split her bed and slept.

The split implies the childish act of drawing an imaginary line down the middle, and each keeping to one side (which is pretty much what we did, as kids). Essentially creating two 'virtual' bed partitions, instead of sharing one.

share|improve this answer
1  
'Splitting' does the job very well. –  Newb Jan 30 at 5:16

There is a word "cosleeping" (or "co-sleeping", if you'd prefer) which generally applies to infants and their parents, but seems ripe for repurposing.

Alternatively: Cosominating

share|improve this answer
1  
Sometimes "sharing sleep" is used in this sense as well. –  KitFox Jan 28 at 17:28
4  
In my experience, this tends to result in "sharing sleeplessness"... –  Floris Jan 28 at 18:17

Do you mean sleeping in the same bed, or just the same house?

A colloquial (in the UK) for non-sexual sleeping in the same bed is "topping and tailing" where you sleep with heads at the opposite ends.

share|improve this answer
23  
which is translated by teenagers as "sixty-nining giggle giggle" –  Carl Witthoft Jan 28 at 14:18
10  

For the case where two people are sleeping in the bed, perhaps because there are no extra beds, I would say that they "shared a bed." As in "the two cousins shared a bed," or "the house was so crowded that holiday weekend, four siblings shared a single bed."

share|improve this answer
2  
Good example. I can't quite define why "at the hotel, she shared a bed with him" doesn't have any sexual innuendo, while "at the hotel, she slept in the bed with him" (another suggestion) seems to leave it open to interpretation. I suppose the word "share" implies dividing up a limited resource out of necessity. –  AmeliaBR Jan 28 at 18:31
2  
On the other hand, a phrase like "she shared his bed" is definitely sexual. (Google it if you like.) –  Nate Eldredge Jan 28 at 18:35

Bundling, tarrying or, in some parts of the US at least, boarding traditionally referred to "sleeping with someone" without sex.

Traditionally, participants were adolescents, with a boy staying at the residence of a girl. They were given separate blankets by the girl's parents and expected to talk to one another through the night. The practice was limited to the winter and sometimes the use of a bundling board, placed between the boy and girl, ensured that no sexual conduct would take place.

share|improve this answer
1  
I think the end of that article sums it up pretty nicely: "See also [...] Non-penetrative sex" =D –  Christian Jan 30 at 20:17

What about simply substituting "alongside" for "with". Note the difference:

  • I slept with Roxanne.
  • I slept alongside Roxanne.
share|improve this answer

This answer is a variant of @Gamemorize's answer which I think is a lot less ambiguous.

  • If sleeping in the same bed, use this exact phrase:

    "He and she slept in the same bed". Notice the lack of "together", replaced by strengthening the location connotation with "the same".

    This is made even more unambiguous if you use any of synonums of "to sleep" which haven't developed sexual connotation that sleeping did:

    "He and she slumbered in the same bed". "He and she caught some ZZZs in the same bed".

  • If sleeping in the same room/house, use "sharing":

    "He and she shared a room/house". Or you can go with previous approach: "He and she slept in the same room".

share|improve this answer
2  
+1. It sounds very formal and strategic. –  Anonymous Jan 29 at 2:21

Where I live people use "slept over" or "sleeping over" or to "sleep over" etc.

Examples: I slept over John's house. I'm sleeping over Rebecca's tonight.

Etc.

Sleeping over can cover innocently sharing a bed, perhaps even top and tail, sleeping on the floor etc.

It says here "North American" but we use it here in Britain: Sleep Over

Staying over can be used in lieu of sleeping over.

share|improve this answer

You could just say nothing went down in plain English. For example, The biblical story of King David mentions his nurse Abishag, and lays it out very plainly that they slept in the same bed, but didn't have sex. She just kept him warm at night.

1Now king David was old and stricken in years; and they covered him with clothes, but he gat no heat. 2Wherefore his servants said unto him, Let there be sought for my lord the king a young virgin: and let her stand before the king, and let her cherish him, and let her lie in thy bosom, that my lord the king may get heat. 3So they sought for a fair damsel throughout all the coasts of Israel, and found Abishag a Shunammite, and brought her to the king. 4And the damsel was very fair, and cherished the king, and ministered to him: but the king knew her not.

share|improve this answer

A rather informal way of saying this, and this has a whiff of slang about it can be:

I bunked with her

Which, to me at least, doesn't suggest sexual contact. In the UK, you might also say:

We kipped in the same bed

Probably owing to the fact that kip, as a noun, means bed, there is no real suggestion of sex here, too.
But generally, I'd simply say what I mean:

We slept in the same bed
We shared the bed, [optional: and slept]

Mind you, if you emphasize "and slept" too much, you may get the odd cynical look from people, generally accompanied with the "ri-ight, you just 'slept'" smirk. Just say you shared the bed in a neutral, factual sort of way, and specify you just slept if you notice people are thinking you didn't get as much sleep as maybe you did :)

Ah well, all in all, the moment you talk about 2 people in the same bed, there's bound to be a couple of people that'll think more of it. A dirty mind is a joy forever, as my parents used to say, and you can't do right by everyone.
If you're worried about people taking it the wrong way, you could just shut them up and turn the "joke" on them. Instead of wrecking my brain trying to find a non-sexual phrase, I'd probably look into phrases concerning jealousy, and what words there are for people who haven't had any in years...

share|improve this answer

I believe that the closest you can get is "slumber." If you say, "I slumbered with him," you avoid the euphemistic idiom. There are many other fine suggestions for being clear that you shared a bed, but using "slumber" instead of "sleep" safely allows the same sentence construction. The downside of using "slumber" is that the word is less common and may strike some as archaic.

share|improve this answer
1  
Funny, I always use slumber in tandem with blissful, which in turn does suggest you have had a better night than usual :) –  Elias Van Ootegem Jan 29 at 9:14

As several respondents have pointed out, there are several phrases that might do the job, although none of them is foolproof to someone who is inclined to imagine sex whether it is involved or not.

An alternative to the phrase you are looking for is to go the opposite direction from being completely explicit about your arrangements: Consider it none of anyone else's business, a.k.a. too much information, and decline to refer to it at all.

share|improve this answer
2  
Thanks. I agree for the most part. Though, there are certain exceptional times. Like the time when I went to Washington, D.C., with my 8th grade class. I got a hotel room with two beds. My roommate and I each got our own bed. Other kids weren't so lucky, and a group of girls had to sleep together on one bed. Then, we had to write a report on it. –  Anonymous Jan 28 at 20:01

I mentioned this in a comment, but I don't think anyone has actually given this answer yet, so...

We call this sharing sleep. It makes it clear you are in the same bed (you wouldn't be sharing if you weren't in the same bed), and rather than saying what you didn't do, it makes it very specific what you did do, which was sleep at the same time the other person was sleeping.

share|improve this answer

You could say

I took a nap at X's place.

Nap has no sexual connotations I think.

share|improve this answer
1  
and also something you do in the afternoon, not at night, and especially not for the whole night. Further, it does not even suggest that X was taking a nap at the same time ;-)... and double-problem, everyone knows not to nap with X'es. –  rolfl Jan 29 at 12:59
1  
@rolfl it does not even suggest that X was taking a nap at the same time that's the point! –  user13107 Jan 31 at 10:01

To my non-native ears, both

"X shared [a | the] bed with Y"

"X and Y shared [a | the] bed"

have no sexual "subtext"

share|improve this answer
1  
You're right if X and Y are not sexually compatible. But if they're hormonal teenagers, it's difficult to believe that the circumstances leading to the "sharing of the bed" were innocent. That's where the sexual context comes in. –  David Schwartz Jan 29 at 21:28
1  
Well, if the listener doesn't believe you it doesn't really matter what you say or how you say it... You might even explicitly add "All they did was sleeping" and on the other end they go "Suuuuuure.... " –  Alex Jan 30 at 8:40

The statement probably has its roots in the puritanical makeup of middle america have lead to the assumption that anything that appears unseemly probably is. It is also those same roots that meant you did not say things untoward directly instead using a seemingly innocuous phrase like "slept with" as a code for relations. "Good and Moral Folks do not tarry about or spread salacious rumors," as my great grandmother used to say. So the gossip would seem to be about normal activities that were fine to talk about.

For this reason anything that does not explicitly say otherwise could be taken an construed salaciously. So you could say

We slept together but it was strictly platonic.

share|improve this answer
4  
This is a good way to go in formal situations, like in writing, in legal proceedings, or in the workplace. But if I said that to a group of my friends... well... Shakespeare put it best: "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." –  David Schwartz Jan 29 at 21:30
2  
Your ad hominem attack surprised me-- my intent was to underscore the utility of your answer (above others) because it is appropriate for the formal communications of IT professionals I work with all over the world who are judged by their English. Informal English has quirks they should be aware of, too. I see from your hostility that you typically dismiss those who don't always speak with your expanded vocabulary and intellectualism. Sadly, we must occasionally stoop to their level. For these irrelevant people, some of the other answers may be more appropriate. –  David Schwartz Jan 30 at 1:44

Can't you just use "we rested for the night together"?

share|improve this answer

A couple of suggestions I can think of:

"We went to sleep in the same bed", I think does not carry any sexual connotation, because it is very descriptive.

or

"We spent the night in the same bed"

or

"We took a nightly sleep together."*

* I guess you can't use 'a sleep' as a countable noun to mean 'a duration of time spent sleeping' like 'a nap', and I could not find any near synonyms. Siesta, slumber etc have their specific meanings and won't serve as replacements to 'sleep'. I suppose there is a gap to fill here in the language.

share|improve this answer

If you're talking about a baby it should be clear there's no implication of sex even if you said something like "we slept together", which normally has strong sexual connotation.

If you're talking about anything but a bed, it should also be relatively clear of sexual connotations. Eg: "We slept in the car while we were on vacation".

If you're talking about sharing a bed with a friend, say when you're on vacation, then you can say:
- We slept in/on the same bed
- We slept in one bed
- We shared the same bed
To highlight that you slept (in the restful sense of the word) on the same bed (location). But because the act of using the same bed together is generally quite an intimate action, there will always be the question on if anything "happened" while you were sleeping in the same bed. However this is as clear as you can be without actually saying "No we didn't do anything!".

These phrases are used commonly to say you've had sex with someone:
- We slept together
- We spent the night together

share|improve this answer

Stating the bleeding obvious:

  • The origin of the sexual connotation is that in most English speaking societies, people who are "sleeping together" are also sexual partners.
  • As evidenced by the plethora of confusing answers here, there is no commonly accepted phrase to express sleeping with someone without implying a sexual relationship.
share|improve this answer

Placing the words "sleeping" and "with" consecutively is what seems to sexualize the phrase. Rearrange them such that "sleeping with" isn't a part of the phrase and it seems much more innocent. Of course, there will always be those who subconsciously rearrange any phrase regarding sleep. It's safe to say you're out of luck there.
Obligatory Examples:
"I was with her sleeping" vs "I was sleeping with her"
"I was with my brother sleeping" vs "I was sleeping with my brother"

As far as an explanation goes, I'd say that most people recognize to sleep with as one verb, and to sleep as another.

share|improve this answer

protected by tchrist Jan 31 at 23:12

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.