English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A line from William Golding's The Lord of the Flies:

All round him the long scar smashed into the jungle was a bath of heat.

Is it just me or does the sentence seem grammatically off?

share|improve this question
it's not grammatically off, it's just a horribly poor sentence. – Joe Blow May 20 '14 at 19:28
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I disagree that it's awkward at all. To add "that had been" to the sentence would be to weaken it. Golding employs here a rhetorical device known as ellipsis, the deliberate "omission of expected words"; and rhetorical impact trumps grammatical nicety any ol' day of the week.

Here's what Ward Farnsworth (quoted above) says about ellipsis in his book Classical English Rhetoric:

An ellipsis involves the audience in an utterance; the reader or listener fills in the missing language, consciously or not.

Whatever your feeling about the sentence, you noticed it. It got under your skin and stayed with you. That, my friend, is good writing.

A scar smashed into a jungle ought to be pretty damn jarring, don't you think? And if it took you more than a few milliseconds to recover and parse the sentence correctly, I would be very surprised.1

1 Edit to promote material from my comment to the answer proper.

share|improve this answer
Everything you say sounds great... but applied to this instance? Enh. A sentence that sticks in the reader's mind because it required a jarring re-reading and re-interpretation on account of a technical issue of sentence structure... not something I would hold up as emblematic of good writing. (Not that every reader or every reading will have that problem, but its susceptibility to it seems pretty clear.) – chaos Mar 2 '11 at 1:33
@chaos: Jarring? Yes! And that is precisely the point. A scar smashed into a jungle ought to be pretty damn jarring, don't you think? And if it took you more than a few milliseconds to recover and parse the sentence correctly, I would be very surprised. – Robusto Mar 2 '11 at 1:36
Hmm. Y'know what, I think I gotta give you that one. Not the usual mode of literary evocativeness, but creatively justifiable as same. Well played, sir. – chaos Mar 2 '11 at 1:40
@Chaos: I agree: Robusto's comment describes what exonerates the sentence. In different circumstances the sentence would have been awkward. The comment deserves to be part of his answer. – Cerberus Mar 2 '11 at 18:38
Nah, it's "jarring" simply because it's a shambles and it's unclear what even the subject is. :) "jarring" in a literary sense doesn't relate to "sentences you can't understand". – Joe Blow May 20 '14 at 19:29

It's a little awkward but grammatically acceptable. The point of confusion is that smashed in that sentence is the past participle, but the sentence structure invites the reader to initially read it as the past simple (used in the narrative mode indicating present action in the storyline).

It would have been clearer, if presumably less satisfying to Mr. Golding and/or his editor, if it had been written:

All round him the long scar that had been smashed into the jungle was a bath of heat.

share|improve this answer
Clearer? Maybe. Better? Certainly not. – Robusto Mar 2 '11 at 1:22
@Robusto: Didn't say it was. It's unequivocally far clunkier with the addition. – chaos Mar 2 '11 at 1:28
I don't know the context, but I think part of the problem too is that the passive tends to suggest an 'action' with a 'patient', and "scars" aren't something you normally "smash", and jungles aren't normally the recipients of smashing actions. – Neil Coffey Mar 2 '11 at 4:28
I also don't know the context, but I think an additional problem may be the reader expecting a plural after the "all around him the" start instead of the singular "scar". As with Neil's comment, not incorrect but maybe slightly unexpected and thus throwing the reader off (in combination with all the other mentioned "issues"). Disclaimer: I don't say this is a shortcoming of the sentence. Maybe rather the opposite. – user3448 Mar 2 '11 at 5:49
Regarding context: I don't have my copy of the book immediately at hand, but I believe this is one of the earliest (if not the first) sentences in the book, shortly after the boys' plane crashed into the jungle. The author is describing the burning scar left by the aircraft. – Matthew Burr Mar 2 '11 at 7:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.