Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

"In two thousand AND eight blah blah blah until two thousand AND thirteen blah blah blah" Is there some grammar rule that if you're stating a year you should say "and" within a number or is there a rule that in politics you should say "and" within a number?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Mari-Lou A, medica, Edwin Ashworth, tchrist, Mitch Jan 5 at 21:39

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

2  
Which politicians? –  Tristan r Jan 3 at 18:10
4  
There are some American grammar school teachers who teach that you should never say "and" within a number. I believe that the more colloquial way to do it is to use "and". Politicians like to sound colloquial. –  Peter Shor Jan 3 at 18:10
1  
Peter, it is also the way to do it in the UK. Not including the word and seems to be an American thing in particular. –  Tristan r Jan 3 at 18:39
    
Leaving out ‘and’, while perfectly common in many dialects (and idiolects), just sounds plain wrong to me. It grates, even though I know there's nothing universally wrong with it. I'm sure there are many who feel the same about leaving the ‘and’ in. –  Janus Bahs Jacquet Jan 3 at 18:39
1  
@JoeC: No, that is not a rule. ‘And’ does not mean decimal point anywhere near as often as it is simply a part of a number exceeding 100 (or, if you count the archaic, ‘German’ way of putting the tens last, exceeding 20). If you want to denote decimal points, use ‘point’ for clarity; otherwise, you’re bound to be misunderstood. In fact, if you use ‘and’ like that without specifying what unit follows, I’d say you’re absolutely certain to be misunderstood. “Two thousand and thirteen” can just as well be thirteen millionths as hundredths. –  Janus Bahs Jacquet Jan 4 at 1:50

1 Answer 1

I don't know that it's a rule of grammar, but the word "and" can resolve ambiguity in expressing decimal numbers:

200.014 = two hundred and fourteen thousandths
0.214 = two hundred fourteen thousandths

Let this direct your habits as you see fit.

share|improve this answer
1  
That doesn’t really resolve any ambiguity—many people would understand both those to mean 0.214. If you want to be unambiguous, say “two hundred point zero one four” and “(zero) point two one four”, respectively. –  Janus Bahs Jacquet Jan 4 at 1:53
    
Interesting that a reply to a purely American question (it would be really odd to leave out the and in a year in British English) brings in another purely American usage: I don't believe I have ever heard somebody in England refer to a decimal as so many hundredths or thousandths: those numbers would always be two hundred point oh one four (or zero one four). I've only ever encountered the usage in American novels. (There is the obsolescent unit thou, which means "thousandth of an inch", but that is different). –  Colin Fine Jan 4 at 2:21
    
Putting the 'and' in can also have advantages in spoken English at least: two hundred and three foot-high bushes // two hundred three foot high bushes (I've omitted the required hyphen/s from the written form, as the spoken version would not indicate the different senses without unusual prosody). Let this direct your habits as you see fit. –  Edwin Ashworth Jan 4 at 12:32

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.